https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5662
--- Comment #31 from Mark Martinec 2009-06-29 09:44:03
PST ---
For reference:
Assuming the 'rules' directory is now specific to 3.3 and
not inherited by 3.2, I added the new DKIM rules there and
adjusted some old ones:
rules/25_
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5662
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5662
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-28 12:05 ---
> yep, it's relatively simple, just check in the changes under
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/dns and I'll make
> them active.
Good.
> I wa
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5662
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-28 09:39 ---
> > dkim.org dropped their "testing1234" selector, so the tests (which all
> > depend on it) stopped working a while back. At some point we should
> > probab
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5662
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-28 09:35 ---
> > Doesn't Mark, Daryl, and Justin make 3 votes total?
> Yes, yes it does.
Commited to 3.2:
svn -m 'bug 5662: recognize author signature and multiple
sig
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5662
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-28 04:37 ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> > One thing: if I enable t/dkim.t, and set "run_net_tests=y", all tests fail.
> > does it need to be updated to match?
>
> dkim.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5662
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status Whiteboard|needs 1 vote for 3.2|go
--- Additional Com
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5662
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-26 06:13 ---
Doesn't Mark, Daryl, and Juatin make 3 votes total?
I get failure in t/dkim.t when it is enabled both before and after the patch, so
I'm confused about how t
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5662
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status Whiteboard|needs 2 votes (+1'd from|needs 1 vote for 3.2
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5662
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status Whiteboard|needs a -1 from Daryl |needs 2 votes (+1'd from
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5662
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-24 07:11 ---
Comment #10 From Daryl C. W. O'Shea
> - $scan->{match_in_whitelist_auth} could be named better so that it's
> not open to easy naming collision with develop
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5662
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #4186 is|0 |1
obsolete|
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5662
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-23 19:02 ---
spamassassin-trunk$ svn -m "
DKIM: never trigger signsome to avoid useless rule firing;
optimize whitelisting as suggested by Daryl - don't invoke
verif
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5662
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status Whiteboard|can be committed for 3.2 |needs a -1 from Daryl
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5662
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status Whiteboard|needs 1 vote for 3.2 and a |can be committed for 3.2
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5662
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status Whiteboard|needs 1 vote for 3.2 |needs 1 vote for 3.2 and a
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5662
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-18 13:10 ---
The current model in SSP is to have three possible settings:
DKIM=unknown (Signature Optional)
DKIM=all (Signature Required, Any party)
DKIM=stric
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5662
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-17 12:58 ---
'There's no punishment of senders by not causing an informational rule that
scores ~0 to fire on damn near every email received. The only punishment is to
th
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5662
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-17 12:42 ---
Uh crap, it seems my memory is failing me lately. :o
(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > - it's now impossible to use DKIM for whiteli
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5662
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-17 08:21 ---
> All past versions only checked for a policy testing
> flag, never for a public key testing flag.
The underlying reason for this absence of information on a
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5662
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-17 06:52 ---
> I few issues I've spotted so far:
> - $scan->{dkim_key_testing} is always 0
Yes. Same as in 3.2.3 - I haven't touched it. The 3.1.8 didn't
even have it.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5662
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-17 04:15 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> - it's now impossible to use DKIM for whitelisting only by setting the
> scores
>for the DKIM rules to 0;
Daryl, can you
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5662
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-16 15:32 ---
Sorry for dragging my ass on this... I still haven't tried this out, I've only
looked over the patch quickly a couple weeks ago.
I few issues I've spotted so
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5662
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-26 01:56 ---
(In reply to comment #8)>
> The resulting code is (again) the same as the current code
> in trunk, except for the commented-out calls to scoped timing,
> whi
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5662
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-23 17:33 ---
Created an attachment (id=4192)
--> (http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=4192&action=view)
merge-in the r595503 from trunk: fix anchoring
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5662
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|DKIM plugin overhaul - |[review] DKIM plugin
26 matches
Mail list logo
