Justin Mason writes:
> Theo Van Dinter writes:
> > On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 05:54:18PM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
> > > as far as I know, if they're rules in the "rulesrc" tree, it's
> > > C-T-R; but rules in the "rules" dir are still R-T-C.
> > >
> > > I'd be happy to loosen this up, though.
> >
Justin Mason wrote:
> Theo Van Dinter writes:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 05:54:18PM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
>>
>>> as far as I know, if they're rules in the "rulesrc" tree, it's
>>> C-T-R; but rules in the "rules" dir are still R-T-C.
>>>
>>> I'd be happy to loosen this up, though.
>>>
Justin Mason wrote:
ok, let's vote to change the procedure: that changes in the "rules" tree
be considered Commit-Then-Review, even when changes in the code (such as
"lib") are considered Review-Then-Commit.
My vote: +1
+1
On Thursday August 2 2007 19:56:11 Justin Mason wrote:
> ok, let's vote to change the procedure: that changes in the "rules" tree
> be considered Commit-Then-Review, even when changes in the code (such as
> "lib") are considered Review-Then-Commit.
+1
Mark
+1 for this from me as well. "Rules is Rules" (Wonders is someone will
get my quote?)
+1 for me as well to CTR rules.
Regards,
KAM
Justin Mason wrote, On 3/8/07 5:56 AM:
ok, let's vote to change the procedure: that changes in the "rules" tree
> be considered Commit-Then-Review, even when changes in the code (such as
> "lib") are considered Review-Then-Commit.
+1
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Justin Mason wrote:
> Theo Van Dinter writes:
>> On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 05:54:18PM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
>>> as far as I know, if they're rules in the "rulesrc" tree, it's
>>> C-T-R; but rules in the "rules" dir are still R-T-C.
>>>
>>> I'd be happy to loosen this up, though.
>> I'm fine with
Theo Van Dinter writes:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 05:54:18PM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
> > as far as I know, if they're rules in the "rulesrc" tree, it's
> > C-T-R; but rules in the "rules" dir are still R-T-C.
> >
> > I'd be happy to loosen this up, though.
>
> I'm fine with that too. The rul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Justin Mason wrote:
> Theo Van Dinter writes:
>> On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 05:54:18PM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
>>> as far as I know, if they're rules in the "rulesrc" tree, it's
>>> C-T-R; but rules in the "rules" dir are still R-T-C.
>>>
>>> I'd be ha
