Re: Fwd: Jenkins build is still unstable: SpamAssassin-trunk #8283

2013-01-04 Thread Mark Martinec
Kevin, > OK, so we are consistently failing this test on Jenkins > [...] > But your thinking this is a bug similar to freemail where we have > incorrect output going into the report? I think so, but I need to check to make sure. > Or could it be something DNS related such as rate limiting? Not

Re: Fwd: Jenkins build is still unstable: SpamAssassin-trunk #8283

2013-01-04 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 1/4/2013 12:06 PM, Mark Martinec wrote: Back to the two URIBL tests. https://builds.apache.org/job/SpamAssassin-trunk/8283/testReport/ Anyone got a moment to look into this? We've ween this before (need to find a ref...). The additional text on URIBL rules can be wrong (belonging to anothe

Re: Fwd: Jenkins build is still unstable: SpamAssassin-trunk #8283

2013-01-04 Thread Mark Martinec
> Back to the two URIBL tests. > > https://builds.apache.org/job/SpamAssassin-trunk/8283/testReport/ > > Anyone got a moment to look into this? We've ween this before (need to find a ref...). The additional text on URIBL rules can be wrong (belonging to another test). Running the same test more

Fwd: Jenkins build is still unstable: SpamAssassin-trunk #8283

2013-01-04 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Back to the two URIBL tests. https://builds.apache.org/job/SpamAssassin-trunk/8283/testReport/ Anyone got a moment to look into this? Original Message Subject:Jenkins build is still unstable: SpamAssassin-trunk #8283 Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 15:41:18 + (UTC) From: