On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 04:08:28PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> I've been using HashBL for eons so if Gio wants to consider whether his BTC
> RBL
> can handle the load, I'm +1 for enabling it by default.
It's now enabled.
Pretty sure Gio knows how bls work, he can do what he wants with it.
I've been using HashBL for eons so if Gio wants to consider whether his BTC
RBL can handle the load, I'm +1 for enabling it by default.
--
Kevin A. McGrail
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
On Thu,
On 2022-05-26 18:50, Henrik K wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 05:33:18PM +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2022-05-26 14:48, Bill Cole wrote:
> SA. Once it is switched on by default, it will be difficult to end or
> even substantially change in operation. We've handled DNSBLs dying
> well in the
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 05:33:18PM +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On 2022-05-26 14:48, Bill Cole wrote:
>
> > SA. Once it is switched on by default, it will be difficult to end or
> > even substantially change in operation. We've handled DNSBLs dying
> > well in the past on the project side, but
On 2022-05-26 14:48, Bill Cole wrote:
SA. Once it is switched on by default, it will be difficult to end or
even substantially change in operation. We've handled DNSBLs dying
well in the past on the project side, but it is also tough on the
operator of a DNSBL.
i would like to have plugins
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 08:48:13AM -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 2022-05-25 at 23:59:36 UTC-0400 (Thu, 26 May 2022 06:59:36 +0300)
> Henrik K
> is rumored to have said:
>
> > Any objections enabling HashBL plugin by default for new installs?
> >
> > I think it's going to be useful in the future
On 2022-05-25 at 23:59:36 UTC-0400 (Thu, 26 May 2022 06:59:36 +0300)
Henrik K
is rumored to have said:
Any objections enabling HashBL plugin by default for new installs?
I think it's going to be useful in the future with all the new
features.
Only rule in stock rules using it at the moment
Any objections enabling HashBL plugin by default for new installs?
I think it's going to be useful in the future with all the new features.
Only rule in stock rules using it at the moment is GB_HASHBL_BTC, but there
will probably be more and we should make sure it can be easily used if
needed.
