On Tuesday 14 September 2004 21:29 CET Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> "Malte S. Stretz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It's the trust-stuff I already talked about. (Did I? Or did I write
> > in the Wiki?) What I want to try is:
> > * Query PGP servers for cross-signed keys and take that as a trust
>
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 09:19:13PM +0200, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
> Another pluging which does IMO not belong into trunk is the PostgreSQL-
> optimized SQL backend talked about. Also the MSExec plugin Theo just
Sure it should.
> committed should not be there. And there was IMO some discussion
"Malte S. Stretz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's the trust-stuff I already talked about. (Did I? Or did I write in the
> Wiki?) What I want to try is:
> * Query PGP servers for cross-signed keys and take that as a trust path.
> * See what Web-O-Trust might give us. After it got revitali
On Saturday 11 September 2004 23:23 CET Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> "Malte S. Stretz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Updates consists of branches per se, it probably won't ever have a
> > "trunk" (at least so it looks to me, I actually have no clue what that
> > directory is intended for -- can somebo
"Malte S. Stretz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Updates consists of branches per se, it probably won't ever have a
> "trunk" (at least so it looks to me, I actually have no clue what that
> directory is intended for -- can somebody who knoes please put a
> README in there?). This is also not abou
On Saturday 11 September 2004 22:14 CET Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> "Malte S. Stretz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I noticed that we started started to mix the "classical" SVN structure
> > with {trunk,branches,tags} with other top-level dirs. Especially since
> > "updates" was added I have the fee
"Malte S. Stretz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I noticed that we started started to mix the "classical" SVN structure with
> {trunk,branches,tags} with other top-level dirs. Especially since
> "updates" was added I have the feeling that this is the best way into
> chaos ;~)
Most of those tre
Moin,
I noticed that we started started to mix the "classical" SVN structure with
{trunk,branches,tags} with other top-level dirs. Especially since
"updates" was added I have the feeling that this is the best way into
chaos ;~)
Which adds in is, that we (as an Apache Top-Level project) might
