On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 04:17:46PM -0700, Dan Quinlan wrote:
> I propose we have a bug squash. Some possible dates:
I sort of went on a bug bender last night...
There are currently 19 bugs in the 3.0.1 queue.
9 are in review state
4 are, from what I can tell, sporadic or otherwise non reproducab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Quinlan writes:
> Michael Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I agree we need a bug squash, although I was thinking we give 3.0.0 a
> > little more time to flush out a few more of the minor details, but
> > perhaps we've got enough at thi
Michael Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I agree we need a bug squash, although I was thinking we give 3.0.0 a
> little more time to flush out a few more of the minor details, but
> perhaps we've got enough at this point.
I think we have enough to do a release candidate for a 3.0.1. :-)
>
I agree we need a bug squash, although I was thinking we give 3.0.0 a
little more time to flush out a few more of the minor details, but
perhaps we've got enough at this point.
I've got a huge timesink at the moment which makes it difficult to be
online at reasonable hours. I might could do somet
