Matt Kettler wrote:
Warren Togami wrote:
Should we consider all mail in the "Sent" box as legitimate ham to
feed into the masscheck?
[ . . . ]
It's not going to have a normal set of headers on it, ie: it's unlikely
to contain any Received: headers, so I don't think that's good masscheck
fodd
Warren Togami wrote:
> Should we consider all mail in the "Sent" box as legitimate ham to
> feed into the masscheck?
>
> Warren Togami
> wtog...@redhat.com
>
>
It's not going to have a normal set of headers on it, ie: it's unlikely
to contain any Received: headers, so I don't think that's good mass
Should we consider all mail in the "Sent" box as legitimate ham to feed
into the masscheck?
Warren Togami
wtog...@redhat.com
