Justin Mason wrote:
Hey --
if anyone has good, reliable, 99.999%-spam, spamtraps that they'd be
interested in forwarding/redirecting to SpamAssassin -- we now have a new
spamtrap system (with help from MailChannels), and should be able to
deal with quite a high volume of inbound spam.
Hey --
if anyone has good, reliable, 99.999%-spam, spamtraps that they'd be
interested in forwarding/redirecting to SpamAssassin -- we now have a new
spamtrap system (with help from MailChannels), and should be able to
deal with quite a high volume of inbound spam.
http://wiki.apach
Loren Wilton wrote:
> Since SA already accumulates the uris from the message, a modified URIBL
> plugin could be written to go connect to the listed UIRs rather than to the
> blacklist. Of course, you would want to run the normal plugin too, so that
> these URIs get appropriately blacklisted in th
> Whether your idea is good or not, it has to do
> with a suggestion for how to use sa-learn, not anything to do with
development.
Hi Sidney, happy new year!
Actually, while he phrased the RFE in terms of sa-learn, it is actually
something that could be done as an SA plugin, if SA were run on the
Dilyan,
I think this would be better discussed in the spamassassin-users mailing list.
The dev list is for topics regarding the development of SpamAssassin, such as
bugs, coding design, and so on. Whether your idea is good or not, it has to do
with a suggestion for how to use sa-learn, not anythin
Hello and good morning,
As the sa-learn script is used usually to serve spamtraps and every
soam mail is always welcome in the spamtrap, there was an idea coming
from Patrick von der Hagen to encourage the spammers to write to the
spamtrap...
The idea is actually to request every URL
