hi Andre --
A SpamAssassin user mentioned this ruleset today:
http://malware.hiperlinks.com.br/cgi/submit?action=list_sa
it looks good! Would you mind if I added a copy of that to our rule-QA
system (http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/), primarily to determine false
positive rate?
If that goes
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 09:45:42AM +, Justin Mason wrote:
hi Andre --
A SpamAssassin user mentioned this ruleset today:
http://malware.hiperlinks.com.br/cgi/submit?action=list_sa
it looks good! Would you mind if I added a copy of that to our rule-QA
system
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:09:46 +0300, Henrik Krohns wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 09:45:42AM +, Justin Mason wrote:
hi Andre --
A SpamAssassin user mentioned this ruleset today:
http://malware.hiperlinks.com.br/cgi/submit?action=list_sa
it looks good! Would you mind if I added a
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 10:05 -0400, Matt Sergeant wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:09:46 +0300, Henrik Krohns wrote:
I would add \b or so in front of the sigs..
For example, /zief\.pl\//i should be /\bzief\.pl\//i. Unbounded short
domains like that have chances of FPs.
Plus they should