Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33#issuecomment-36831096
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13021/
---
If your project i
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/90#issuecomment-36831094
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13022/
---
If your project i
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/90#issuecomment-36831093
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33#issuecomment-36831095
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user anitatailor commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/87#issuecomment-36830203
@pwendell Thanks, I have fixed style issues
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user sryza commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/86#issuecomment-36828689
Thanks for taking a look, Matei. If we use system properties instead of
env variables, the remaining reason we'd want to start a second JVM is to be
able to have a --driver-
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/90#issuecomment-36828619
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/85#issuecomment-36828600
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13019/
---
If your project i
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33#issuecomment-36828590
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/91#issuecomment-36828598
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/91#issuecomment-36828601
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13016/
---
If your project i
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/90#issuecomment-36828618
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/85#issuecomment-36828597
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/90#issuecomment-36828596
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/90#issuecomment-36828599
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13017/
---
If your project i
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33#issuecomment-36828586
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33#issuecomment-36828591
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13020/
---
If your project i
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/86#issuecomment-36828535
Also, not sure what people think about calling this "spark-submit" instead
of "spark-app". For the in-cluster use case it's really just for submitting,
and I imagine that ca
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/86#issuecomment-36828505
Hey Sandy, the overall approach looks good, though I made some comments
throughout. It would be really nice to avoid launching a second JVM if
possible. It seems that the ma
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/86#discussion_r10332780
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkAppArguments.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (A
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/86#discussion_r10332786
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkApp.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/58
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enable
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/86#discussion_r10332762
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkApp.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/86#discussion_r10332726
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkApp.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/86#discussion_r10332714
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkApp.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/86#discussion_r10332708
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkAppArguments.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/86#discussion_r10332688
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkAppArguments.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/86#discussion_r10332670
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkApp.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/86#discussion_r10332654
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkApp.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/86#discussion_r10332644
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkApp.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/86#discussion_r10332582
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkApp.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/86#discussion_r10332560
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkApp.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under
Github user anitatailor commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/87#issuecomment-36827678
Thanks for review, fixing these
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does no
Github user sryza commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/90#issuecomment-36827609
Oy, good point. Ok, I'll try that out.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/90#issuecomment-36827486
@sryza to test this I would do a `mvn install` and then try building a
simple spark application in sbt or maven against your locally installed
version. Then you can look a
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/90#issuecomment-36827278
@sryza or maybe if we shade _both_ kryo and asm in the package jar, the
shader plug-in is good enough to figure out that one is a dependency of the
other and embed both as
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/90#issuecomment-36827214
Hey @sryza I have a question here. If we shade like this for the `package`
target of core, then as far as I understand this will embed a shaded version of
`asm` inside of
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/58#issuecomment-36827118
Nope, I think this is good to go. Going to merge it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33#issuecomment-36826678
@pwendell Ok this should now be ready for review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If you
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33#issuecomment-36826673
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/90#discussion_r10332154
--- Diff: graphx/pom.xml ---
@@ -70,6 +70,10 @@
scalacheck_${scala.binary.version}
test
+
--- End diff --
@
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/90#discussion_r10332129
--- Diff: graphx/pom.xml ---
@@ -70,6 +70,10 @@
scalacheck_${scala.binary.version}
test
+
--- End diff --
Yes.
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/90#discussion_r10332109
--- Diff: graphx/pom.xml ---
@@ -70,6 +70,10 @@
scalacheck_${scala.binary.version}
test
+
--- End diff --
H
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/87#issuecomment-36826360
One or more automated tests failed
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13018/
---
If your pr
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/87#issuecomment-36826359
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/90#discussion_r10332070
--- Diff: core/pom.xml ---
@@ -269,6 +269,37 @@
+
+ org.apach
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/85#issuecomment-36826295
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33#issuecomment-36826306
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33#issuecomment-36826305
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/87#issuecomment-36826290
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/90#discussion_r10332066
--- Diff: core/pom.xml ---
@@ -269,6 +269,37 @@
+
+ org.apach
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/85#issuecomment-36826294
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/90#issuecomment-36826287
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/87#issuecomment-36826291
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/90#issuecomment-36826288
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/91#issuecomment-36826286
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/91#issuecomment-36826285
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/85#issuecomment-36826226
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/85#issuecomment-36826227
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13015/
---
If your project i
Github user jyotiska commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/34#issuecomment-36825757
@mateiz @JoshRosen Can you verify this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user CodingCat commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/58#issuecomment-36825482
any further comments?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user CodingCat commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12#issuecomment-36825497
any further comments?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33#issuecomment-36825493
Pass securityManager and SparkConf around where we can. Note the changes
to JettyUtils and calling functions. Switch to use SparkConf for getting and
setting configs whe
GitHub user sryza opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/91
SPARK-1193. Fix indentation in pom.xmls
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/sryza/spark sandy-spark-1193
Alternatively you can review a
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/87#discussion_r10331715
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/CassandraCQLTest.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Founda
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/87#discussion_r10331703
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/CassandraCQLTest.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Founda
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/86#discussion_r10331680
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkApp.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) und
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/87#issuecomment-36825193
Hey @anitatailor thanks for contributing this example! Would you mind
cleaning up the style a bit (most likely the build will fail due to style
issues). The main issue is
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/87#discussion_r10331678
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/CassandraCQLTest.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Founda
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/87#issuecomment-36825120
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33#issuecomment-36824999
@tgravescs let me know when you've stopped changing things around. I can do
a final pass. If there are just small things we can punt them to a subsequent
PR to avoid merge
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/86#discussion_r10331562
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkAppArguments.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
GitHub user sryza opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/90
SPARK-782. Shade ASM
This solves the issue of Spark's version of ASM conflicting with the ASM
versions of its transitive dependencies (e.g. Hadoop). The ASM packages, with
their package names modified
Github user sryza commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/86#discussion_r10331365
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkAppArguments.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (AS
Github user sryza commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/86#discussion_r10331320
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkApp.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under o
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/88#issuecomment-36824072
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13014/
---
If your project i
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/85#issuecomment-36824086
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/88#issuecomment-36824070
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/85#issuecomment-36824087
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/89#issuecomment-36824083
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/86#discussion_r10331185
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkApp.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) unde
Github user sryza commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/86#discussion_r10331089
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkApp.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under o
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/86#discussion_r10331035
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkAppArguments.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/86#discussion_r10330871
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkApp.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) unde
GitHub user puravaggarwal opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/89
MetadataCleaner - fine control cleanup documentation
Documentation with reference to commit
b5025d90bbf3e81701a3c3f5e22efbb2e2164eea by Mridul
Date: Fri Oct 4 21:57:57 2013 +0530
- Allow
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/86#discussion_r10330832
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkApp.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) unde
I did not. They would be nice to have.
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Debasish Das wrote:
> David,
>
> There used to be standard BFGS testcases in Professor Nocedal's
> package...did you stress test the solver with them ?
>
> If not I will shoot him an email for them.
>
> Thanks.
> Deb
>
>
>
>
Github user rezazadeh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/88#issuecomment-36822139
@mengxr @mateiz All comments from previous PR done, please take a look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Gi
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/86#discussion_r10330672
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkAppArguments.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/42#issuecomment-36821926
Looks like test failed because of git problems. Retesting later.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33#issuecomment-36821650
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/88#issuecomment-36821827
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/88#issuecomment-36821826
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user rezazadeh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/88
Sparkpca
# Principal Component Analysis
Computes the top k principal component coefficients for the m-by-n data
matrix X. Rows of X correspond to observations and columns correspond to
var
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33#issuecomment-36821651
One or more automated tests failed
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13013/
---
If your pr
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33#issuecomment-36821539
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33#issuecomment-36821538
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/87#issuecomment-36821530
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje
Github user jyotiska closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/83
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
GitHub user anitatailor opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/87
Example for cassandra CQL read/write from spark
Cassandra read/write using CqlPagingInputFormat/CqlOutputFormat
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull ht
1 - 100 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
