Could the error I encountered be due to missing import(s) of implicit ?
Thanks
On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 9:42 PM, Reynold Xin wrote:
> Works for me on latest master.
>
>
>
> scala> sql("explain codegen select 'a' as a group by 1").head
> res3: org.apache.spark.sql.Row =
> [Found 2 WholeStageCodege
No, it can''t. You only need implicits when you are using the catalyst DSL.
The error you get is due to the fact that the parser does not recognize the
CODEGEN keyword (which was the case before we introduced this in
https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/fa1af0aff7bde9bbf7bfa6a3ac74699734c2fd8a).
Hi all,
I noticed the binary pre-build for Hadoop 2.6 which we can download from
spark.apache.org/downloads.html (Direct Download) may be broken.
I couldn't decompress at least following 4 tgzs with "tar xfzv" command
and md5-checksum did't match.
* spark-1.6.1-bin-hadoop2.6.tgz
* spark-1.6.1-bin
[ CC'ing dev list since nearly identical questions have occurred in
user list recently w/o resolution;
c.f.:
http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/Spark-work-distribution-among-execs-tt26502.html
http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/Partitions-are-get-placed-on-the-sing
This is still an issue. The Spark 1.6.1 packages on S3 are corrupt.
Is anyone looking into this issue? Is there anything contributors can do to
help solve this problem?
Nick
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 8:49 PM Nicholas Chammas
wrote:
> Pingity-ping-pong since this is still a problem.
>
>
> On Thu,
The commit you mentioned was made Friday.
I refreshed workspace Sunday - so it was included.
Maybe this was related:
$ bin/spark-shell
Failed to find Spark jars directory
(/home/hbase/spark/assembly/target/scala-2.10).
You need to build Spark before running this program.
Then I did:
$ ln -s /ho
Just to be sure: Has spark-env.sh and spark-defaults.conf been correctly
propagated to all nodes? Are they identical?
> On Apr 4, 2016, at 9:12 AM, Mike Hynes <91m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> [ CC'ing dev list since nearly identical questions have occurred in
> user list recently w/o resolution;
bq. the modifications do not touch the scheduler
If the changes can be ported over to 1.6.1, do you mind reproducing the
issue there ?
I ask because master branch changes very fast. It would be good to narrow
the scope where the behavior you observed started showing.
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 6:12
Oh, I overlooked that. Thanks.
Kousuke
On 2016/04/04 22:58, Nicholas Chammas wrote:
This is still an issue. The Spark 1.6.1 packages on S3 are corrupt.
Is anyone looking into this issue? Is there anything contributors can
do to help solve this problem?
Nick
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 8:49 PM
We can think of using checksum for this kind of issues.
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 8:32 PM, Kousuke Saruta
wrote:
> Oh, I overlooked that. Thanks.
>
> Kousuke
>
>
> On 2016/04/04 22:58, Nicholas Chammas wrote:
>
> This is still an issue. The Spark 1.6.1 packages on S3 are corrupt.
>
> Is anyone loo
Many open source projects are aggressive, such as Oracle JDK and Ubuntu, But
they provide stable commercial supporting.
In other words, the enterprises doesn't drop JDK7, might aslo do not drop Spark
1.x to adopt Spark 2.x early version.
On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 10:29 PM -0700, "Reynold Xi
Thanks.
Of course, I verified checksum and it didn't matched.
Kousuke
On 2016/04/05 0:39, Jitendra Shelar wrote:
We can think of using checksum for this kind of issues.
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 8:32 PM, Kousuke Saruta
mailto:saru...@oss.nttdata.co.jp>> wrote:
Oh, I overlooked that. Thank
Maybe temporarily take out the artifacts on S3 before the root cause is
found.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 7:25 AM, Nicholas Chammas <
nicholas.cham...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just checking in on this again as the builds on S3 are still broken. :/
>
> Could it have something to do with us moving release-
Reynold,
Considering the performance improvements you mentioned in your original
e-mail and also considering that few other big data projects have already
or are in progress of abandoning JDK 7, I think it would benefit Spark if
we go with JDK 8.0 only.
Are there users that will be less aggressiv
we ran into similar issues and it seems related to the new memory
management. can you try:
spark.memory.useLegacyMode = true
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Mike Hynes <91m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> [ CC'ing dev list since nearly identical questions have occurred in
> user list recently w/o resoluti
Why don't you wipe everything out and try again?
On Monday, April 4, 2016, Ted Yu wrote:
> The commit you mentioned was made Friday.
> I refreshed workspace Sunday - so it was included.
>
> Maybe this was related:
>
> $ bin/spark-shell
> Failed to find Spark jars directory
> (/home/hbase/spark/a
Thanks to all who have responded.
It turned out that the following command line for maven caused the error (I
forgot to include this in first email):
eclipse:eclipse
Once I omitted the above, 'explain codegen' works.
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Reynold Xin wrote:
> Why don't you wipe every
It is called groupByKey now. Similar to joinWith, the schema produced by
relational joins and aggregations is different than what you would expect
when working with objects. So, when combining DataFrame+Dataset we renamed
these functions to make this distinction clearer.
On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 1
It's possible this was caused by incorrect Graph creation, fixed in
[SPARK-13355].
Could you retry your dataset using the current master to see if the problem
is fixed? Thanks!
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 5:31 AM, Li Li wrote:
> I have modified my codes. I can get the total vocabulary size and
> i
I think that a backup plan could be to announce that JDK7 is deprecated in
Spark 2.0 and support for it will be fully removed in Spark 2.1. This gives
admins enough warning to install JDK8 along side their "main" JDK (or fully
migrate to it), while allowing the project to merge JDK8-specific change
An additional note: The Spark packages being served off of CloudFront (i.e.
the “direct download” option on spark.apache.org) are also corrupt.
Btw what’s the correct way to verify the SHA of a Spark package? I’ve tried
a few commands on working packages downloaded from Apache mirrors, but I
can’t
Curveball: Is there a need to use lambdas quite yet?
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 10:58 PM, Ofir Manor wrote:
> I think that a backup plan could be to announce that JDK7 is deprecated in
> Spark 2.0 and support for it will be fully removed in Spark 2.1. This gives
> admins enough warning to install JDK
The published hash is a SHA512.
You can verify the integrity of the packages by running `sha512sum` on
the archive and comparing the computed hash with the published one.
Unfortunately however, I don't know what tool is used to generate the
hash and I can't reproduce the format, so I ended up manu
I just found out how the hash is calculated:
gpg --print-md sha512 .tgz
you can use that to check if the resulting output matches the contents
of .tgz.sha
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Jakob Odersky wrote:
> The published hash is a SHA512.
>
> You can verify the integrity of the packages by r
Thanks, that was the command. :thumbsup:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 6:28 PM Jakob Odersky wrote:
> I just found out how the hash is calculated:
>
> gpg --print-md sha512 .tgz
>
> you can use that to check if the resulting output matches the contents
> of .tgz.sha
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:19 PM,
Hi Spark devs,
I'm unsure if what I'm seeing is correct. I'd appreciate any input
to...rest my nerves :-) I did `import org.apache.spark._` by mistake,
but since it's valid, I'm wondering why does Spark shell imports sql
at all since it's available after the import?!
(it's today's build)
scala>
Dear all,
Thank you for your responses.
Michael Slavitch:
> Just to be sure: Has spark-env.sh and spark-defaults.conf been correctly
> propagated to all nodes? Are they identical?
Yes; these files are stored on a shared memory directory accessible to
all nodes.
Koert Kuipers:
> we ran into si
Looks like the import comes from
repl/scala-2.11/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/repl/SparkILoop.scala :
processLine("import sqlContext.sql")
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
> Hi Spark devs,
>
> I'm unsure if what I'm seeing is correct. I'd appreciate any input
> to
Nezih,
Have you had a chance to figure out why this is happening?
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:32 AM, james wrote:
> I guess different workload cause diff result ?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/java-lang-OutOfMemoryError-Una
BTW do you still see this when dynamic allocation is off?
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Reynold Xin wrote:
> Nezih,
>
> Have you had a chance to figure out why this is happening?
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:32 AM, james wrote:
>
>> I guess different workload cause diff result ?
>>
>>
>>
>
can you try:
spark.shuffle.reduceLocality.enabled=false
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 8:17 PM, Mike Hynes <91m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Thank you for your responses.
>
> Michael Slavitch:
> > Just to be sure: Has spark-env.sh and spark-defaults.conf been
> correctly propagated to all nodes?
Hey all,
We merged SPARK-13579 today, and if you're like me and have your
hands automatically type "sbt assembly" anytime you're building Spark,
that won't work anymore.
You should now use "sbt package"; you'll still need "sbt assembly" if
you require one of the remaining assemblies (streaming c
Nope, I didn't have a chance to track the root cause, and IIRC we didn't
observe it when dyn. alloc. is off.
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 6:16 PM Reynold Xin wrote:
> BTW do you still see this when dynamic allocation is off?
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Reynold Xin wrote:
>
>> Nezih,
>>
>> Hav
do i need to run sbt package before doing tests?
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Marcelo Vanzin wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> We merged SPARK-13579 today, and if you're like me and have your
> hands automatically type "sbt assembly" anytime you're building Spark,
> that won't work anymore.
>
> You sho
No, tests (except pyspark) should work without having to package anything first.
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Koert Kuipers wrote:
> do i need to run sbt package before doing tests?
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Marcelo Vanzin wrote:
>>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> We merged SPARK-13579 today, a
pyspark and R
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:59 PM, Marcelo Vanzin wrote:
> No, tests (except pyspark) should work without having to package anything
> first.
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Koert Kuipers wrote:
> > do i need to run sbt package before doing tests?
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 1
36 matches
Mail list logo