The name is from Apache Calcite, And it doesn’t matter, we can introduce our
own.
---
Regards!
Aron Tao
发件人: Mark Hamstra
日期: 2018年10月23日 星期二 12:28
收件人: "taojia...@gmail.com"
抄送: dev
主题: Re: About introduce function sum0 to Spark
That's a horrible name. This is just a fold.
On Mon, Oct 22,
That's a horrible name. This is just a fold.
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 7:39 PM 陶 加涛 wrote:
> Hi, in calcite, has the concept of sum0, here I quote the definition of
> sum0:
>
>
>
> Sum0 is an aggregator which returns the sum of the values which
>
> go into it like Sum. It differs in that when no n
+1 On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 01:42:06 +0800 Wenchen
Fan wrote Please vote on releasing the following
candidate as Apache Spark version 2.4.0.The vote is open until October 26 PST
and passes if a majority +1 PMC votes are cast, witha minimum of 3 +1 votes.[ ]
+
+1
--
Sent from: http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/
-
To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
Hi, in calcite, has the concept of sum0, here I quote the definition of sum0:
Sum0 is an aggregator which returns the sum of the values which
go into it like Sum. It differs in that when no non null values
are applied zero is returned instead of null..
One scenario is that we can use sum0 to impl
+1
No blockers and our internal tests are all passing.
(I did file https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-25805, but this is
just a minor issue with a flaky test)
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 12:42 PM Wenchen Fan wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
Regarding the doc tickets, I vaguely remember that we can merge doc PRs
after release and publish doc to spark website later. Can anyone confirm?
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 8:30 AM Sean Owen wrote:
> This is what I got from a straightforward build of the source distro
> here ... really, ideally, it
This is what I got from a straightforward build of the source distro
here ... really, ideally, it builds as-is from source. You're saying
someone would have to first build a k8s distro from source too?
It's not a 'must' that this be automatic but nothing else fails out of the box.
I feel like I mig
> tar (child): Error is not recoverable: exiting now
> tar: Child returned status 2
> tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now
> scripts/setup-integration-test-env.sh: line 85:
> /home/srowen/spark-2.4.0/resource-managers/kubernetes/
> integration-tests/target/spark-dist-unpacked/bin/docker-image
Provisionally looking good to me, but I had a few questions.
We have these open for 2.4, but I presume they aren't actually going
to be in 2.4 and should be untargeted:
SPARK-25507 Update documents for the new features in 2.4 release
SPARK-25179 Document the features that require Pyarrow 0.10
SPA
ok, it looks like webhooks are caught up... turning jenkins back on now.
if anyone sees any strange behavior, please reply back immediately to this
thread and i'll see what i can do on my end to mitigate any further issues
(aka 'service jenkins stop').
shane
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 2:14 PM shan
quick update:
the github status messages have gone from "red" to "orange", which to me
still means "we're broken". :)
https://status.github.com/messages
i'm still holding off on restarting jenkins, but if things don't change
within a couple of hours, i'll start it back up and keep an eye on
PRB
Since GitHub and Jenkins are in a chaotic state, I didn't wait for a green
Jenkins QA job for the RC4 commit. We should fail this RC if the Jenkins is
broken (very unlikely).
I'm adding my own +1, all known blockers are resolved.
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 1:42 AM Wenchen Fan wrote:
> Please vote
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
2.4.0.
The vote is open until October 26 PST and passes if a majority +1 PMC votes
are cast, with
a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 2.4.0
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
To
i've actually taken jenkins down completely.
after i see an 'all clear' on their status page, i'll bring jenkins back up.
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 9:34 AM shane knapp wrote:
> jenkins is no longer accepting new builds.
>
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 8:55 AM Hyukjin Kwon wrote:
>
>> It's chaotic no
jenkins is no longer accepting new builds.
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 8:55 AM Hyukjin Kwon wrote:
> It's chaotic now.. can we turn off the Jenkins for a while if the Github
> is being out of order for a while? My notifications are full of
> AmblapJenkins bot messages ...
>
> On Mon, 22 Oct 2018, 1:
It's chaotic now.. can we turn off the Jenkins for a while if the Github is
being out of order for a while? My notifications are full of AmblapJenkins
bot messages ...
On Mon, 22 Oct 2018, 1:13 pm Hyukjin Kwon, wrote:
> Yea.. please ignore my duplicated comments if they exist. I didn't know
> it
Hi, Kazuaki,
Thanks for your great SPIP! I am willing to be the shepherd of this SPIP.
Cheers,
Xiao
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 12:05 AM Kazuaki Ishizaki
wrote:
> Hi Yamamuro-san,
> Thank you for your comments. This SPIP gets several valuable comments and
> feedback on Google Doc:
> https://docs
Hi Yamamuro-san,
Thank you for your comments. This SPIP gets several valuable comments and
feedback on Google Doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Jzf56bxpMpSwsGV_hSzl9wQG22hyI731McQcjognqxY/edit?usp=sharing
.
I hope that this SPIP could go forward based on these feedback.
Based on this SPIP
19 matches
Mail list logo