+1
Thanks.
2019년 1월 11일 (금) 오전 7:01, Takeshi Yamamuro 님이 작성:
> ok, thanks for the check.
>
> best,
> takeshi
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 1:37 AM Dongjoon Hyun
> wrote:
>
>> Hi, Takeshi.
>>
>> Yep. It's not a release blocker. We don't need that as Sean mentioned
>> already.
>> Since you are the
ok, thanks for the check.
best,
takeshi
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 1:37 AM Dongjoon Hyun
wrote:
> Hi, Takeshi.
>
> Yep. It's not a release blocker. We don't need that as Sean mentioned
> already.
> Since you are the release manager of 2.3.3, you may include that in the
> scope of Spark 2.3.3 befor
Here are my notes from the DSv2 sync last night.
*As usual, I didn’t take great notes because I was participating in the
discussion. Feel free to send corrections or clarification.*
*Attendees*:
Ryan Blue
John Zhuge
Xiao Li
Reynold Xin
Felix Cheung
Anton Okolnychyi
Bruce Robbins
Dale Richardson
D
srowen closed pull request #166: Further expand and update the merge and commit
process for committers
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark-website/pull/166
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of prov
dongjoon-hyun commented on issue #166: Further expand and update the merge and
commit process for committers
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark-website/pull/166#issuecomment-453167761
Great! Thank you for updating, @srowen .
---
dongjoon-hyun commented on a change in pull request #166: Further expand and
update the merge and commit process for committers
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark-website/pull/166#discussion_r246836939
##
File path: committers.md
##
@@ -127,13 +127,41 @@ Git history for
Hi, Takeshi.
Yep. It's not a release blocker. We don't need that as Sean mentioned
already.
Since you are the release manager of 2.3.3, you may include that in the
scope of Spark 2.3.3 before it starts.
Bests,
Dongjoon.
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:44 AM Sean Owen wrote:
> Is that the right link
srowen opened a new pull request #166: Further expand and update the merge and
commit process for committers
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark-website/pull/166
Following up on
https://github.com/apache/spark-website/commit/eb0aa14df472cff092b35ea1b894a0d880185561#r31886611
with additio
srowen closed pull request #165: Update
2018-12-19-spark-ai-summit-apr-2019-agenda-posted.md
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark-website/pull/165
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenance:
A
Is that the right link? that is marked as a minor bug, maybe. From
what you describe it's not a regression from 2.2.2 either.
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 6:37 AM Takeshi Yamamuro wrote:
>
> Hi, Dongjoon,
>
> We don't need to include https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23456 in this
> release?
> The
Hi, Dongjoon,
We don't need to include https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23456 in this
release?
The query there fails in v2.x while it passes in v1.6.
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 10:16 AM Sean Owen wrote:
> Hm OK those other profiles should be unrelated. I'll see if I can
> figure it out, but it
11 matches
Mail list logo