Re: [VOTE] SPARK 2.2.3 (RC1)

2019-01-10 Thread Hyukjin Kwon
+1 Thanks. 2019년 1월 11일 (금) 오전 7:01, Takeshi Yamamuro 님이 작성: > ok, thanks for the check. > > best, > takeshi > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 1:37 AM Dongjoon Hyun > wrote: > >> Hi, Takeshi. >> >> Yep. It's not a release blocker. We don't need that as Sean mentioned >> already. >> Since you are the

Re: [VOTE] SPARK 2.2.3 (RC1)

2019-01-10 Thread Takeshi Yamamuro
ok, thanks for the check. best, takeshi On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 1:37 AM Dongjoon Hyun wrote: > Hi, Takeshi. > > Yep. It's not a release blocker. We don't need that as Sean mentioned > already. > Since you are the release manager of 2.3.3, you may include that in the > scope of Spark 2.3.3 befor

DataSourceV2 sync notes

2019-01-10 Thread Ryan Blue
Here are my notes from the DSv2 sync last night. *As usual, I didn’t take great notes because I was participating in the discussion. Feel free to send corrections or clarification.* *Attendees*: Ryan Blue John Zhuge Xiao Li Reynold Xin Felix Cheung Anton Okolnychyi Bruce Robbins Dale Richardson D

[GitHub] srowen closed pull request #166: Further expand and update the merge and commit process for committers

2019-01-10 Thread GitBox
srowen closed pull request #166: Further expand and update the merge and commit process for committers URL: https://github.com/apache/spark-website/pull/166 This is a PR merged from a forked repository. As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for the sake of prov

[GitHub] dongjoon-hyun commented on issue #166: Further expand and update the merge and commit process for committers

2019-01-10 Thread GitBox
dongjoon-hyun commented on issue #166: Further expand and update the merge and commit process for committers URL: https://github.com/apache/spark-website/pull/166#issuecomment-453167761 Great! Thank you for updating, @srowen . ---

[GitHub] dongjoon-hyun commented on a change in pull request #166: Further expand and update the merge and commit process for committers

2019-01-10 Thread GitBox
dongjoon-hyun commented on a change in pull request #166: Further expand and update the merge and commit process for committers URL: https://github.com/apache/spark-website/pull/166#discussion_r246836939 ## File path: committers.md ## @@ -127,13 +127,41 @@ Git history for

Re: [VOTE] SPARK 2.2.3 (RC1)

2019-01-10 Thread Dongjoon Hyun
Hi, Takeshi. Yep. It's not a release blocker. We don't need that as Sean mentioned already. Since you are the release manager of 2.3.3, you may include that in the scope of Spark 2.3.3 before it starts. Bests, Dongjoon. On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:44 AM Sean Owen wrote: > Is that the right link

[GitHub] srowen opened a new pull request #166: Further expand and update the merge and commit process for committers

2019-01-10 Thread GitBox
srowen opened a new pull request #166: Further expand and update the merge and commit process for committers URL: https://github.com/apache/spark-website/pull/166 Following up on https://github.com/apache/spark-website/commit/eb0aa14df472cff092b35ea1b894a0d880185561#r31886611 with additio

[GitHub] srowen closed pull request #165: Update 2018-12-19-spark-ai-summit-apr-2019-agenda-posted.md

2019-01-10 Thread GitBox
srowen closed pull request #165: Update 2018-12-19-spark-ai-summit-apr-2019-agenda-posted.md URL: https://github.com/apache/spark-website/pull/165 This is a PR merged from a forked repository. As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for the sake of provenance: A

Re: [VOTE] SPARK 2.2.3 (RC1)

2019-01-10 Thread Sean Owen
Is that the right link? that is marked as a minor bug, maybe. From what you describe it's not a regression from 2.2.2 either. On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 6:37 AM Takeshi Yamamuro wrote: > > Hi, Dongjoon, > > We don't need to include https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23456 in this > release? > The

Re: [VOTE] SPARK 2.2.3 (RC1)

2019-01-10 Thread Takeshi Yamamuro
Hi, Dongjoon, We don't need to include https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23456 in this release? The query there fails in v2.x while it passes in v1.6. On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 10:16 AM Sean Owen wrote: > Hm OK those other profiles should be unrelated. I'll see if I can > figure it out, but it