>
> I don't have a good sense of the overhead of continuing to support
> Python 2; is it large enough to consider dropping it in Spark 3.0?
>
> from the build/test side, it will actually be pretty easy to continue
support for python2.7 for spark 2.x as the feature sets won't be expanding.
that bei
Here’s the tweet from the horse’s mouth:
https://twitter.com/gvanrossum/status/1133496146700058626?s=21
Cheers
Jules
—
Sent from my iPhone
Pardon the dumb thumb typos :)
> On May 29, 2019, at 10:12 PM, Sean Owen wrote:
>
> Deprecated -- certainly and sooner than later.
> I don't have a good
Deprecated -- certainly and sooner than later.
I don't have a good sense of the overhead of continuing to support
Python 2; is it large enough to consider dropping it in Spark 3.0?
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 11:47 PM Xiangrui Meng wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I want to revive this old thread since no acti
Hi all,
I want to revive this old thread since no action was taken so far. If we
plan to mark Python 2 as deprecated in Spark 3.0, we should do it as early
as possible and let users know ahead. PySpark depends on Python, numpy,
pandas, and pyarrow, all of which are sunsetting Python 2 support by
2
I think the particular issue here isn't resolved by
scala-collection-compat: TraversableOnce goes away. However I hear
that maybe Scala 2.13 retains it as a deprecated alias, which might
help.
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 4:59 PM antonkulaga wrote:
>
> There is https://github.com/scala/scala-collectio
Add a +1 from me as well.
Just managed to finish going over it.
Thanks Bobby for leading this effort !
Regards,
Mridul
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 2:51 PM Tom Graves wrote:
>
> Ok, I'm going to call this vote and send the result email. We had 9 +1's (4
> binding) and 1 +0 and no -1's.
>
> Tom
>
>
Sorry these notes are so late, I didn’t get to the write up until now. As
usual, if anyone has corrections or comments, please reply.
*Attendees*:
John Zhuge
Ryan Blue
Andrew Long
Wenchen Fan
Gengliang Wang
Russell Spitzer
Yuanjian Li
Yifei Huang
Matt Cheah
Amardeep Singh Dhilon
Zhilmil Dhion
Rya
Thanks Tom.
I finally had time to look at the updated SPIP 10 mins ago. I support the high
level idea and +1 on the SPIP.
That said, I think the proposed API is too complicated and invasive change to
the existing internals. A much simpler API would be to expose a columnar batch
iterator interf
There is https://github.com/scala/scala-collection-compat to enable 2.13
collections in Scala 2.12, so probably you can use it to avoid having
separate source trees for 2.12 and 2.13
--
Sent from: http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/
---
Ok, I'm going to call this vote and send the result email. We had 9 +1's (4
binding) and 1 +0 and no -1's.
Tom
On Monday, May 27, 2019, 3:25:14 PM CDT, Felix Cheung
wrote:
#yiv8731614492 html {background-color:transparent;}#yiv8731614492 body
{color:#333;line-height:150%;margin:0;}#yi
Hi all,
The vote passed with 9 +1's (4 binding) and 1 +0 and no -1's.
+1s (* = binding) :
Bobby Evans*
Thomas Graves*
DB Tsai*
Felix Cheung*
Bryan Cutler
Kazuaki Ishizaki
Tyson Condie
Dongjoon Hyun
Jason Lowe
+0s:
Xiangrui Meng
Thanks,
Tom Graves
--
12 matches
Mail list logo