Re: [DISCUSS] SPIP: State Data Source - Reader

2023-10-16 Thread Jungtaek Lim
Thanks Bartosz and Anish for your support! I'll wait for a couple more days to see whether we can hear more voices on this. We could probably look for initiating a VOTE thread if there is no objection. On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 5:48 AM Anish Shrigondekar < anish.shrigonde...@databricks.com> wrote:

Re: [DISCUSS] SPIP: State Data Source - Reader

2023-10-16 Thread Anish Shrigondekar
Hi Jungtaek, Thanks for putting this together. +1 from me and looks good overall. Posted some minor comments/questions to the doc. Thanks, Anish On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 11:25 AM Bartosz Konieczny wrote: > Thank you, Jungtaek, for your answers! It's clear now. > > +1 for me. It seems like a pre

Re: [DISCUSS] SPIP: State Data Source - Reader

2023-10-16 Thread Bartosz Konieczny
Thank you, Jungtaek, for your answers! It's clear now. +1 for me. It seems like a prerequisite for further ops-related improvements for the state store management. I mean especially here the state rebalancing that could rely on this read+write state store API. I don't mean here the dynamic state r

Re: [DISCUSS] SPIP: State Data Source - Reader

2023-10-16 Thread Jungtaek Lim
bump for better reach On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 4:26 PM Jungtaek Lim wrote: > Sorry, please use this link instead for SPIP doc: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_iVf_CIu2RZd3yWWF6KoRNlBiz5NbSIK0yThqG0EvPY/edit?usp=sharing > > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 3:58 PM Jungtaek Lim > wrote: > >> Hi de