Thank you all.
Here is an update.
Thanks to your help, all open blocker issues (including correctness issues) are
resolved.
However, I'm still waiting for this additional alternative approach PR for the
previously resolved JIRAs.
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/43760 (for Apache Spark 4.
Hello,
I am writing to check if what I am encountering is bug or the behavior
that is expected from Spark 3.4.x and over.
I've noticed that analysis quickly fails on a "/NoSuchElementException:
None.get/" with the JavaBeanEncoder in deserialization since 3.4.x, if a
candidate field has a acc
Here is an initial Implementation draft PR
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/42352 and design doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_YmfCsQQb9XhRdKh0ijbc-j8JKGtGBxYsk_30NVSTWo/edit?usp=sharing
On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 5:24 PM Pavan Kotikalapudi
wrote:
> Hi Dev community,
>
> Just bumping t
Hi Dev community,
Just bumping to see if there are more reviews to evaluate this idea of
adding auto-scaling to structured streaming.
Thanks again,
Pavan
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 2:49 PM Pavan Kotikalapudi
wrote:
> Thanks for the review Mich.
>
> I have updated the Q4 with as concise informati
To be clear: I am generally supportive of the idea (+1) but have some
follow-up questions:
Have we taken the time to learn from the other operators? Do we have a
compatible CRD/API or not (and if so why?)
The API seems to assume that everything is packaged in the container in
advance, but I imagin
resending cc dev for record - sorry forgot to reply all earlier :)
For 1 - I'm more leaning towards 'official' as this aims to provide Spark
users a community-recommended way to automate and manage Spark deployments
on k8s. It does not mean the current / other options would become
off-standard fro
I'd say that's actually the other way round. A user may either
1. Use spark-submit, this works with or without operator. Or,
2. Deploy the operator, create the Spark Applications with kubectl /
clients - so that the Operator does spark-submit for you.
We may also continue this discussion in the pro