Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Row-level operations in Data Source V2

2021-11-12 Thread Yufei Gu
+1 > On Nov 12, 2021, at 6:25 PM, L. C. Hsieh wrote: > > Hi all, > > I’d like to start a vote for SPIP: Row-level operations in Data Source V2. > > The proposal is to add support for executing row-level operations > such as DELETE, UPDATE, MERGE for v2 tables (SPARK-35801). The > execution sho

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Catalog API for view metadata

2022-02-04 Thread Yufei Gu
+1 (non-binding) Best, Yufei `This is not a contribution` On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 11:54 AM huaxin gao wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 11:40 AM L. C. Hsieh wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 7:25 PM Chao Sun wrote: >> > >> > +1 (non-binding). Looking forward to t

Re: Introducing Comet, a plugin to accelerate Spark execution via DataFusion and Arrow

2024-02-13 Thread Yufei Gu
Absolutely thrilled to see the project going open-source! Huge congrats to Chao and the entire team on this milestone! Yufei On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 12:43 PM Chao Sun wrote: > Hi all, > > We are very happy to announce that Project Comet, a plugin to > accelerate Spark query execution via lever

Re: [DISCUSS] Move Variant to Parquet?

2024-08-21 Thread Yufei Gu
Agreed that Parquet would be a good place to host the new type. Different table formats, like Iceberg and Delta can benefit from it as they have based on parquet already. Yufei On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 12:15 AM Alkis Evlogimenos wrote: > +1 > > In addition to everything said above, it is also a

Re: [DISCUSS] Move Variant to Parquet?

2024-08-26 Thread Yufei Gu
gt; >>> On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 4:43 PM huaxin gao >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 for moving variant type to Parquet, as it promotes standardization >>>> and interoperability across numerous projects. >>>> >>>> Huaxin >>>>

Re: [VOTE] Move Variant to Parquet

2024-09-03 Thread Yufei Gu
+1 Yufei On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 4:35 PM Gengliang Wang wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 4:29 PM rdb...@gmail.com wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 3:38 PM Gene Pang wrote: >> >>> Hi Micah, >>> >>> I wanted to open this vote to get official alignment on where the Spark >>> comm