This vote is cancelled in favor of RC2. Thanks to everyone who voted.

On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 11:23 PM, Andrew Ash <and...@andrewash.com> wrote:
> Ok that's reasonable -- it's certainly more of an enhancement than a
> critical bug-fix.  I would like to get this in for 1.1.0 though, so let's
> talk through the right way to do that on the PR.
>
> In the meantime the best alternative is running with lax firewall settings,
> which can be somewhat mitigated by modifying the ephemeral port range.
>
> Thanks!
> Andrew
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> The port stuff is great to have, but they are pretty big changes to the
>> core that are introducing new features and are not exactly fixing important
>> bugs. For this reason, it probably can't block a release (I'm not even sure
>> if it should go into a maintenance release where we fix critical bugs for
>> Spark core).
>>
>> We should definitely include them for 1.1.0 though (~Aug).
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Andrew Ash <and...@andrewash.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks for helping shepherd the voting on 1.0.1 Patrick.
>> >
>> > I'd like to call attention to
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-2157 and
>> > https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1107 -- "Ability to write tight
>> > firewall rules for Spark"
>> >
>> > I'm currently unable to run Spark on some projects because our cloud ops
>> > team is uncomfortable with the firewall situation around Spark at the
>> > moment.  Currently Spark starts listening on random ephemeral ports and
>> > does server to server communication on them.  This keeps the team from
>> > writing tight firewall rules between the services -- they get real queasy
>> > when asked to open inbound connections to the entire ephemeral port range
>> > of a cluster.  We can tighten the size of the ephemeral range using
>> kernel
>> > settings to mitigate the issue, but it doesn't actually solve the
>> problem.
>> >
>> > The PR above aims to make every listening port on JVMs in a Spark
>> > standalone cluster configurable with an option.  If not set, the current
>> > behavior stands (start listening on an ephemeral port).  Is this
>> something
>> > the Spark team would consider merging into 1.0.1?
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> > Andrew
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hey All,
>> > >
>> > > We're going to move onto another rc because of this vote.
>> > > Unfortunately with the summit activities I haven't been able to usher
>> > > in the necessary patches and cut the RC. I will do so as soon as
>> > > possible and we can commence official voting.
>> > >
>> > > - Patrick
>> > >
>> > > On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > > We should make sure we include the following two patches:
>> > > >
>> > > > https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1264
>> > > >
>> > > > https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1263
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Krishna Sankar <ksanka...@gmail.com
>> >
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> +1
>> > > >> Compiled for CentOS 6.5, deployed in our 4 node cluster (Hadoop 2.2,
>> > > YARN)
>> > > >> Smoke Tests (sparkPi,spark-shell, web UI) successful
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Cheers
>> > > >> <k/>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Patrick Wendell <
>> pwend...@gmail.com>
>> > > >> wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark
>> > > version
>> > > >> > 1.0.1!
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > The tag to be voted on is v1.0.1-rc1 (commit 7feeda3):
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=spark.git;a=commit;h=7feeda3d729f9397aa15ee8750c01ef5aa601962
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
>> found
>> > > at:
>> > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-1.0.1-rc1/
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>> > > >> > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/pwendell.asc
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > The staging repository for this release can be found at:
>> > > >> >
>> > >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1020/
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at:
>> > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-1.0.1-rc1-docs/
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Spark 1.0.1!
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > The vote is open until Monday, June 30, at 03:00 UTC and passes if
>> > > >> > a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 1.0.1
>> > > >> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > To learn more about Apache Spark, please see
>> > > >> > http://spark.apache.org/
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > === About this release ===
>> > > >> > This release fixes a few high-priority bugs in 1.0 and has a
>> variety
>> > > >> > of smaller fixes. The full list is here: http://s.apache.org/b45.
>> > > Some
>> > > >> > of the more visible patches are:
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > SPARK-2043: ExternalAppendOnlyMap doesn't always find matching
>> keys
>> > > >> > SPARK-2156 and SPARK-1112: Issues with jobs hanging due to akka
>> > frame
>> > > >> size.
>> > > >> > SPARK-1790: Support r3 instance types on EC2.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > This is the first maintenance release on the 1.0 line. We plan to
>> > make
>> > > >> > additional maintenance releases as new fixes come in.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > - Patrick
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>>

Reply via email to