I will cut a new one once https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15774 gets
in.
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Sean Owen wrote:
> I guess it's worth explicitly stating that I think we need another RC one
> way or the other because this test seems to consistently fail. It
+1
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 7:20 PM, Michael Armbrust
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Reynold Xin wrote:
>
>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
>> 2.0.2. The vote is open until Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at
I guess it's worth explicitly stating that I think we need another RC one
way or the other because this test seems to consistently fail. It was a
(surprising) last-minute regression. I think I'd have to say -1 only for
this.
Reverting https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15706 for branch-2.0
+1
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Michael Armbrust
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Reynold Xin wrote:
>
>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
>> 2.0.2. The vote is open until Fri, Nov 4, 2016
+1
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Reynold Xin wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
> 2.0.2. The vote is open until Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 22:00 PDT and passes if a
> majority of at least 3+1 PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release
+1
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Reynold Xin wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
> 2.0.2. The vote is open until Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 22:00 PDT and passes if a
> majority of at least 3+1 PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release
ache.org>
Cc: "dev@spark.apache.org" <dev@spark.apache.org>
Date: 02/11/2016 18:37
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 2.0.2 (RC2)
Looks like there is an issue with Maven (likely just the test itself
though). We should look into it.
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at
Looks like there is an issue with Maven (likely just the test itself
though). We should look into it.
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Dongjoon Hyun wrote:
> Hi, Sean.
>
> The same failure blocks me, too.
>
> - SPARK-18189: Fix serialization issue in KeyValueGroupedDataset
Hi, Sean.
The same failure blocks me, too.
- SPARK-18189: Fix serialization issue in KeyValueGroupedDataset *** FAILED ***
I used `-Pyarn -Phadoop-2.7 -Pkinesis-asl -Phive -Phive-thriftserver -Dsparkr`
on CentOS 7 / OpenJDK1.8.0_111.
Dongjoon.
On 2016-11-02 10:44 (-0700), Sean Owen
Sigs, license, etc are OK. There are no Blockers for 2.0.2, though here are
the 4 issues still open:
SPARK-14387 Enable Hive-1.x ORC compatibility with
spark.sql.hive.convertMetastoreOrc
SPARK-17957 Calling outer join and na.fill(0) and then inner join will miss
rows
SPARK-17981 Incorrectly Set
Sure - given the nature of the bug, it looked like it may have gone under the
radar in prior 2.0 releases (test cases pass) so thought to bring attention
to this for some evaluation of the criticality this issue. Will take further
discussion to the ticket.
--
View this message in context:
Vinayak,
Thanks for the email. This is really not the thread meant for reporting
existing regressions. It's best just commenting on the jira ticket and even
better submit a fix for it.
On Tuesday, November 1, 2016, vijoshi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Have encountered an issue with
Hi,
Have encountered an issue with History Server in 2.0 - and updated
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16808 with a comment detailing
the problem. This is a regression in 2.0 from 1.6, so this issue exists
since 2.0.1. Encountered this very recently when we evaluated moving to 2.0
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
2.0.2. The vote is open until Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 22:00 PDT and passes if a
majority of at least 3+1 PMC votes are cast.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 2.0.2
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
The
14 matches
Mail list logo