Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Identifiers for multi-catalog Spark

Hi everyone, With 12 +1 votes and no +0 or -1 votes, this SPIP passes. Thanks to everyone that participated in the discussions and voted! rb On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 12:14 AM Xiao Li wrote: > +1 This is in the right direction. The resolution rules and catalog APIs > need more discussion when

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Identifiers for multi-catalog Spark

+1 This is in the right direction. The resolution rules and catalog APIs need more discussion when we implement it. In the current stage, we can disallow the runtime creation of the catalog. This will complicate the name resolution in a multi-session environment. For example, when one user

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Identifiers for multi-catalog Spark

+1 On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 4:59 PM JackyLee wrote: > +1 > > > > -- > Sent from: http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/ > > - > To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org > > -- --- Takeshi

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Identifiers for multi-catalog Spark

+1 -- Sent from: http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/ - To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Identifiers for multi-catalog Spark

+1 From: Ryan Blue Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2019 9:34 AM To: Jamison Bennett Cc: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Identifiers for multi-catalog Spark +1 On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 8:41 AM Jamison Bennett wrote: +1 (non-binding) Jamison Bennett Cloudera

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Identifiers for multi-catalog Spark

+1 On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 8:41 AM Jamison Bennett wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Jamison Bennett > > Cloudera Software Engineer > > jamison.benn...@cloudera.com > > 515 Congress Ave, Suite 1212 | Austin, TX | 78701 > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 10:33 AM Maryann Xue > wrote: > >> +1 >>

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Identifiers for multi-catalog Spark

+1 (non-binding) Jamison Bennett Cloudera Software Engineer jamison.benn...@cloudera.com 515 Congress Ave, Suite 1212 | Austin, TX | 78701 On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 10:33 AM Maryann Xue wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 10:46 PM John Zhuge wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Feb 18,

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Identifiers for multi-catalog Spark

+1   Regards,Dilip Biswal  - Original message -From: Maryann Xue To: John Zhuge Cc: Dongjoon Hyun , dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Identifiers for multi-catalog SparkDate: Mon, Feb 18, 2019 9:27 PM  +1   On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 10:46 PM John Zhuge wrote: +1  On Mon, Feb

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Identifiers for multi-catalog Spark

+1 On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 10:46 PM John Zhuge wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 8:43 PM Dongjoon Hyun > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Dongjoon. >> >> On 2019/02/19 04:12:23, Wenchen Fan wrote: >> > +1 >> > >> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 10:50 AM Ryan Blue >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Hi everyone, >>

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Identifiers for multi-catalog Spark

+1 On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 8:43 PM Dongjoon Hyun wrote: > +1 > > Dongjoon. > > On 2019/02/19 04:12:23, Wenchen Fan wrote: > > +1 > > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 10:50 AM Ryan Blue > > wrote: > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > It looks like there is consensus on the proposal, so I'd like to

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Identifiers for multi-catalog Spark

+1 Dongjoon. On 2019/02/19 04:12:23, Wenchen Fan wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 10:50 AM Ryan Blue > wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > It looks like there is consensus on the proposal, so I'd like to start a > > vote thread on the SPIP for identifiers in multi-catalog Spark. > > >

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Identifiers for multi-catalog Spark

+1 On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 10:50 AM Ryan Blue wrote: > Hi everyone, > > It looks like there is consensus on the proposal, so I'd like to start a > vote thread on the SPIP for identifiers in multi-catalog Spark. > > The doc is available here: >

[VOTE] SPIP: Identifiers for multi-catalog Spark

Hi everyone, It looks like there is consensus on the proposal, so I'd like to start a vote thread on the SPIP for identifiers in multi-catalog Spark. The doc is available here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jEcvomPiTc5GtB9F7d2RTVVpMY64Qy7INCA_rFEd9HQ/edit?usp=sharing Please vote in the