Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC1)

d question, I built the release candidate however the >>>>>>>>> Jenkins scripts don't take a parameter for configuring who signs them >>>>>>>>> rather >>>>>>>>> it always signs them with Patrick's key. You can see t

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC1)

> Jenkins scripts don't take a parameter for configuring who signs them >>>>>>>> rather it always signs them with Patrick's key. You can see this from >>>>>>>> previous releases which were managed by other folks but still signed by >>>>>>>> Patrick. >>>>>>>>

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC1)

;denny.g@gmail.com > <mailto:denny.g@gmail.com>> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 10:57 PM Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com > <mailto:felixcheun...@hotmail.com>> wrote: > +1 tested SparkR package on Windows, r-hub, Ub

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC1)

still signed by >>>>>>> Patrick. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Ryan Blue <rb...@netflix.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The signature is valid,

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC1)

>>> The signature is valid, but why was the release signed with Patrick >>>>>>> Wendell's private key? Did Patrick build the release candidate? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> rb >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri,

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC1)

gnature is valid, but why was the release signed with Patrick >>>>>> Wendell's private key? Did Patrick build the release candidate? >>>>>> >>>>>> rb >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 6:36 AM, Denny Lee <denny.g@gmail.com> >>>>>

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC1)

t;>> Wendell's private key? Did Patrick build the release candidate? >>>>> >>>>> rb >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 6:36 AM, Denny Lee <denny.g@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>&

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC1)

6 AM, Denny Lee <denny.g@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 10:57 PM Felix Cheung < >>>>> felixcheun...@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 tested SparkR package on

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC1)

1 (non-binding) >>>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 10:57 PM Felix Cheung < >>>> felixcheun...@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 tested SparkR package on Windows, r-hub, Ubuntu. >>>>> >>>>> _ >&g

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC1)

ote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 10:57 PM Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 tested SparkR package on Windows, r-hub, Ubuntu. >>>> >>>>

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC1)

Yes ;) From: Xiao Li <gatorsm...@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, September 15, 2017 2:22:03 PM To: Holden Karau Cc: Ryan Blue; Denny Lee; Felix Cheung; Sean Owen; dev@spark.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC1) Sorry, this release candidate is

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC1)

>>>> felixcheun...@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 tested SparkR package on Windows, r-hub, Ubuntu. >>>>> >>>>> _ >>>>> From: Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> >>>>> Sent:

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC1)

p 14, 2017 at 10:57 PM Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 tested SparkR package on Windows, r-hub, Ubuntu. >>>> >>>> _ >>>> From: Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> >&g

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC1)

;> From: Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> >>> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 3:12 PM >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC1) >>> To: Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca>, <dev@spark.apache.org> >>> >>> >>> >>

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC1)

ung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > >> +1 tested SparkR package on Windows, r-hub, Ubuntu. >> >> _ >> From: Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> >> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 3:12 PM >> Subject: Re: [VOT

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC1)

:12 PM > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC1) > To: Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca>, <dev@spark.apache.org> > > > > +1 > Very nice. The sigs and hashes look fine, it builds fine for me on Debian > Stretch with Java 8, yarn/hive/hadoop-2.7 profiles, and

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC1)

+1 tested SparkR package on Windows, r-hub, Ubuntu. _ From: Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com<mailto:so...@cloudera.com>> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 3:12 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC1) To: Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca<mailto:ho

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC1)

+1 Very nice. The sigs and hashes look fine, it builds fine for me on Debian Stretch with Java 8, yarn/hive/hadoop-2.7 profiles, and passes tests. Yes as you say, no outstanding issues except for this which doesn't look critical, as it's not a regression. SPARK-21985 PySpark PairDeserializer is

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC1)

Yea. I think I found the root cause. The correct one is the following as Sean said. https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20SPARK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.1.2 The current RC vote email has the following. List of JIRA tickets resolved in this release can be found

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC1)

I think the search filter is OK, but for whatever reason the filter link includes what JIRA you're currently browsing, and that one is not actually included in the filter. It opens on a JIRA that's not included, but the search results look correct. project = SPARK AND fixVersion = 2.1.2 On Thu,

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC1)

Hi, Holden. It's not a problem, but the link of `List of JIRA ... with this filter` seems to be wrong. Bests, Dongjoon. On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Holden Karau wrote: > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version > 2.1.2. The vote is

[VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC1)

Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version 2.1.2. The vote is open until Friday September 22nd at 18:00 PST and passes if a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 2.1.2 [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...