Re: Disabling Closed -> Reopened transition for non-committers

2017-10-05 Thread Nicholas Chammas
Whoops, didn’t mean to send that out to the list. Apologies. Somehow, an earlier draft of my email got sent out. Nick 2017년 10월 5일 (목) 오전 9:20, Nicholas Chammas 님이 작성: > The first sign that that conversation was going to go downhill was when > the user [demanded]( >

Re: Disabling Closed -> Reopened transition for non-committers

2017-10-05 Thread Ryan Blue
That makes more sense. If this is something that committers can do to stop a single issue from being reopened, I'm more okay with that. But we need to make sure that we don't accidentally use it when closing issues or over-use it. I guess I'm +0 on it. On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Sean Owen

Re: Disabling Closed -> Reopened transition for non-committers

2017-10-05 Thread lucas.g...@gmail.com
I missed Steve's comments :( That looks like a really healthy process, but also time consuming. I guess that's what it takes to make a community? Gary

Re: Disabling Closed -> Reopened transition for non-committers

2017-10-05 Thread Sean Owen
Yeah to be clear I'm not suggesting that -- issues are just "Resolved" in general which anyone can continue reopening. That's exactly because new facts can come to light, a different opinion can arrive later, etc. I'm trying to have some control over someone repeatedly reopening issues every 15

Re: Disabling Closed -> Reopened transition for non-committers

2017-10-05 Thread lucas.g...@gmail.com
As a casual reader of the dev mailing group / Spark JIRA This looks reasonable to me. I read the JIRA in question and although I didn't spend enough time to really dig into the issues presented I think it's reasonable to close in this situation. If the person with the grievance feels strongly

Re: Disabling Closed -> Reopened transition for non-committers

2017-10-05 Thread Ryan Blue
While I have also felt this frustration and understand the motivation, I don't think it's a good idea to disallow people from reopening issues. Like Steve said, this is something that is better dealt with socially. If we did implement this, we're shutting out the polite people when *we* make

Re: Disabling Closed -> Reopened transition for non-committers

2017-10-05 Thread Hyukjin Kwon
It's, Closed -> Reopened (not, Resolved -> Reopened) and I think we mostly leave JIRAs as Resolved. I support this idea. I think don't think this is unfriendly as it sounds in practice. This case should be quite occasional I guess. 2017-10-05 20:02 GMT+09:00 Sean Owen : >

Re: Disabling Closed -> Reopened transition for non-committers

2017-10-05 Thread Steve Loughran
It's a losing battle which you need to deal with socially rather than through the tooling...if the user is unhappy then at best they don't use the code, don't contribute in future, at worse: they keep filing the same JIRA. I'll add a comment In hadoop we've ended up creating a wiki page added

Re: Disabling Closed -> Reopened transition for non-committers

2017-10-05 Thread Sean Owen
Solving it socially is of course ideal. We do already likewise point everyone to http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html . I think this is about what to do in extreme cases. It's a minor point of workflow, but, seems like there's no particular need to let anyone reopen any issue. Speaking to

Re: Disabling Closed -> Reopened transition for non-committers

2017-10-05 Thread Sean Owen
> > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 4, 2017 7:51:37 PM > *To:* Dongjoon Hyun > *Cc:* dev > *Subject:* Re: Disabling Closed -> Reopened transition for non-committers > > Although I assume we could get an account suspended if it started opening > spam issues, yes we default

Re: Disabling Closed -> Reopened transition for non-committers

2017-10-04 Thread Felix Cheung
nesday, October 4, 2017 7:51:37 PM To: Dongjoon Hyun Cc: dev Subject: Re: Disabling Closed -> Reopened transition for non-committers Although I assume we could get an account suspended if it started opening spam issues, yes we default to letting anyone open issues, and potentially abusing it.

Re: Disabling Closed -> Reopened transition for non-committers

2017-10-04 Thread Sean Owen
Although I assume we could get an account suspended if it started opening spam issues, yes we default to letting anyone open issues, and potentially abusing it. That much is the right default and I don't see any policy tweak that stops that. I see several INFRA tickets asking to *allow* the

Re: Disabling Closed -> Reopened transition for non-committers

2017-10-04 Thread Dongjoon Hyun
It can stop reopening, but new JIRA issues with duplicate content will be created intentionally instead. Is that policy (privileged reopening) used in other Apache communities for that purpose? On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 7:06 PM, Sean Owen wrote: > We have this problem

Disabling Closed -> Reopened transition for non-committers

2017-10-04 Thread Sean Owen
We have this problem occasionally, where a disgruntled user continually reopens an issue after it's closed. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-21999 (Feel free to comment on this one if anyone disagrees) Regardless of that particular JIRA, I'd like to disable to Closed -> Reopened