Re: MLlib mission and goals

2017-01-31 Thread Seth Hendrickson
>> More at: https://blogs.oracle.com/BestPerf/entry/improving_algorithms >> _in_spark_ml >> Background: >> >> Brad Carlile. Parallelism, compute intensity, and data vectorization. >> SuperComputing'93, November 1993. >> <https://blogs.oracle.com/BestPerf

Re: MLlib mission and goals

2017-01-24 Thread Joseph Bradley
g'93, November 1993. > <https://blogs.oracle.com/BestPerf/resource/Carlile-app_compute-intensity-1993.pdf> > > John McCalpin. 213876927_Memory_Bandwidth_and_Machine_Balance_in_ > Current_High_Performance_Computers 1995 > <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/213876927_Mem

Re: MLlib mission and goals

2017-01-24 Thread bradc
gt; John McCalpin. 213876927_Memory_Bandwidth_and_Machine_Balance_in_Current_High_Performance_Computers 1995 <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/213876927_Memory_Bandwidth_and_Machine_Balance_in_Current_High_Performance_Computers> -- View this message in context: http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.c

Re: MLlib mission and goals

2017-01-24 Thread Saikat Kanjilal
: java...@gmail.com; dev@spark.apache.org; Sean Owen Subject: Re: MLlib mission and goals On the topic of usability, I think more effort should be put into large scale testing. We've encountered issues with building large models that are not apparent in small models, and these issues hav

Re: MLlib mission and goals

2017-01-24 Thread Asher Krim
oesch <java...@gmail.com> > To: Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> > Cc: "dev@spark.apache.org" <dev@spark.apache.org> > Subject: Re: MLlib mission and goals > Date: Tue, Jan 24, 2017 4:42 AM > > re: spark-packages.org and "Would these really be better in the core

Re: MLlib mission and goals

2017-01-24 Thread Miao Wang
24, 2017 at 1:03 AM Joseph Bradley <jos...@databricks.com> wrote: This thread is split off from the "Feedback on MLlib roadmap process proposal" thread for discussing the high-level mission and goals for MLlib.  I hope this thread will collect feedback and ideas, not necessarily lead

Re: MLlib mission and goals

2017-01-24 Thread Stephen Boesch
AM Joseph Bradley <jos...@databricks.com> > wrote: > >> This thread is split off from the "Feedback on MLlib roadmap process >> proposal" thread for discussing the high-level mission and goals for >> MLlib. I hope this thread will collect feedback and id

Re: MLlib mission and goals

2017-01-24 Thread Jörn Franke
his thread is split off from the "Feedback on MLlib roadmap process >> proposal" thread for discussing the high-level mission and goals for MLlib. >> I hope this thread will collect feedback and ideas, not necessarily lead to >> huge decisions. >>

Re: MLlib mission and goals

2017-01-24 Thread Sean Owen
osal" thread for discussing the high-level mission and goals for > MLlib. I hope this thread will collect feedback and ideas, not necessarily > lead to huge decisions. > > Copying from the previous thread: > > *Seth:* > """ > I would love to hear som

Re: MLlib mission and goals

2017-01-23 Thread Stephen Boesch
the high-level mission and goals for > MLlib. I hope this thread will collect feedback and ideas, not necessarily > lead to huge decisions. > > Copying from the previous thread: > > *Seth:* > """ > I would love to hear some discussion on the higher level goal of S

MLlib mission and goals

2017-01-23 Thread Joseph Bradley
This thread is split off from the "Feedback on MLlib roadmap process proposal" thread for discussing the high-level mission and goals for MLlib. I hope this thread will collect feedback and ideas, not necessarily lead to huge decisions. Copying from the previous thread: *Seth:* "