Re: Moving forward with the timestamp proposal

I think this is the right direction to go, but I'm wondering how can Spark support these new types if the underlying data sources(like parquet files) do not support them yet. I took a quick look at the new doc for file formats, but not sure what's the proposal. Are we going to implement these new

Moving forward with the timestamp proposal

Hi, Last december we shared a timestamp harmonization proposal with the Hive, Spark and Impala communities. This was followed by an extensive discussion in January that lead to various updates and improvements to the proposal, as well as the creation of a new document for