[adding dev]
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Fazlan Nazeem wrote:
> I just went through all specifications, and they expect the version
> attribute. This should be addressed very soon because if we cannot use the
> PMML model without the version attribute, there is no use of generating one
> wit
I'm pretty sure that attribute is required. I am not sure what PMML
version the code has been written for but would assume 4.2.1. Feel
free to open a PR to add this version to all the output.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Fazlan Nazeem wrote:
> [adding dev]
>
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 2:27 PM,
Thanks Owen. Will do it
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Sean Owen wrote:
> I'm pretty sure that attribute is required. I am not sure what PMML
> version the code has been written for but would assume 4.2.1. Feel
> free to open a PR to add this version to all the output.
>
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 a
Hi,
I confirm the models are exported for PMML version 4.2, in fact you can see
in the generated xml
PMML xmlns="http://www.dmg.org/PMML-4_2";
This is the default version when using
https://github.com/jpmml/jpmml-model/tree/1.1.X.
I didn't realize the attribute version of the PMML root element wa
Hi Vincenzo/Owen,
I have sent a pull request[1] with necessary changes to add the pmml
version attribute to the root node. I have also linked the issue under the
PMML improvement umbrella[2] as you suggested.
[1] https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9558
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
Thank you Fazlan, looks good!
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/Re-PMML-version-in-MLLib-tp14944p15112.html
Sent from the Apache Spark Developers List mailing list archive at Nabble.com
