Re: Remove Flume support in 3.0.0?

2018-10-12 Thread Hyukjin Kwon
Yea, I thought we are already going to remove this out. +1 for removing it anyway. 2018년 10월 12일 (금) 오전 1:44, Wenchen Fan 님이 작성: > Note that, it was deprecated in 2.3.0 already: > https://spark.apache.org/docs/2.3.0/streaming-flume-integration.html > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 12:46 AM Reynold

Re: Remove Flume support in 3.0.0?

2018-10-11 Thread Wenchen Fan
Note that, it was deprecated in 2.3.0 already: https://spark.apache.org/docs/2.3.0/streaming-flume-integration.html On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 12:46 AM Reynold Xin wrote: > Sounds like a good idea... > > > On Oct 11, 2018, at 6:40 PM, Sean Owen wrote: > > > > Yep, that already exists as Bahir. >

Re: Remove Flume support in 3.0.0?

2018-10-11 Thread Reynold Xin
Sounds like a good idea... > On Oct 11, 2018, at 6:40 PM, Sean Owen wrote: > > Yep, that already exists as Bahir. > Also, would anyone object to declaring Flume support at least > deprecated in 2.4.0? >> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 2:29 PM Jörn Franke wrote: >> >> I think it makes sense to remove

Re: Remove Flume support in 3.0.0?

2018-10-11 Thread Sean Owen
Yep, that already exists as Bahir. Also, would anyone object to declaring Flume support at least deprecated in 2.4.0? On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 2:29 PM Jörn Franke wrote: > > I think it makes sense to remove it. > If it is not too much effort and the architecture of the flume source is not >

Re: Remove Flume support in 3.0.0?

2018-10-10 Thread Sean Owen
Yup was thinking the same. It is legacy too at this point. On Wed, Oct 10, 2018, 3:19 PM Marcelo Vanzin wrote: > BTW, although I did not file a bug for that, I think we should also > consider getting rid of the kafka-0.8 connector. > > That would leave only kafka-0.10 as the single remaining

Re: Remove Flume support in 3.0.0?

2018-10-10 Thread Marcelo Vanzin
BTW, although I did not file a bug for that, I think we should also consider getting rid of the kafka-0.8 connector. That would leave only kafka-0.10 as the single remaining dstream connector in Spark, though. (If you ignore kinesis which we can't ship in binary form or something like that?) On

Re: Remove Flume support in 3.0.0?

2018-10-10 Thread Jörn Franke
I think it makes sense to remove it. If it is not too much effort and the architecture of the flume source is not considered as too strange one may extract it as a separate project and put it on github in a dedicated non-supported repository. This would enable distributors and other companies

Remove Flume support in 3.0.0?

2018-10-10 Thread Sean Owen
Marcelo makes an argument that Flume support should be removed in 3.0.0 at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-25598 I tend to agree. Is there an argument that it needs to be supported, and can this move to Bahir if so?