Re: Scala 2.11 default build

2016-02-04 Thread Sean Owen
Many of these changes are not needed - please see how the profiles work. Please also open 1 PR for one logical change and not 4. On Fri, Feb 5, 2016, 06:03 zzc <441586...@qq.com> wrote: > Hi Prashant Sharma, i saw that there already were some pr submitted by > Luciano Resende: > https://github.co

Re: Scala 2.11 default build

2016-02-04 Thread zzc
Hi Prashant Sharma, i saw that there already were some pr submitted by Luciano Resende: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11075 https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11074 https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11076 https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11077 -- View this message in context: ht

Re: Scala 2.11 default build

2016-02-04 Thread Luciano Resende
There were few more issues, I have started tracking them at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13189 On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 2:08 AM, Prashant Sharma wrote: > Yes, That should be changed to 2.11.7. Mind sending a patch ? > > Prashant Sharma > > > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 2:11 PM, zzc <4

Re: Scala 2.11 default build

2016-02-04 Thread Prashant Sharma
Yes, That should be changed to 2.11.7. Mind sending a patch ? Prashant Sharma On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 2:11 PM, zzc <441586...@qq.com> wrote: > hi, rxin, in pom.xml file, 'scala.version' still is 2.10.5, does it need > to > be modified to 2.11.7? > > > > -- > View this message in context: > htt

Re: Scala 2.11 default build

2016-02-04 Thread zzc
hi, rxin, in pom.xml file, 'scala.version' still is 2.10.5, does it need to be modified to 2.11.7? -- View this message in context: http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/Scala-2-11-default-build-tp16157p16207.html Sent from the Apache Spark Developers List mailing list arch

Re: Scala 2.11 default build

2016-02-01 Thread Reynold Xin
Yes they do. We haven't dropped 2.10 support yet. There are too many 2.10 active deployments out there. On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Jakob Odersky wrote: > Awesome! > +1 on Steve Loughran's question, how does this affect support for > 2.10? Do future contributions need to work with Scala 2.

Re: Scala 2.11 default build

2016-02-01 Thread Jakob Odersky
Awesome! +1 on Steve Loughran's question, how does this affect support for 2.10? Do future contributions need to work with Scala 2.10? cheers On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 7:02 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > The following jobs have been established for build against Scala 2.10: > > https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/

Re: Scala 2.11 default build

2016-02-01 Thread Ted Yu
The following jobs have been established for build against Scala 2.10: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/view/Spark%20QA%20Compile/job/SPARK-master-COMPILE-MAVEN-SCALA-2.10/ https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/view/Spark%20QA%20Compile/job/SPARK-master-COMPILE-sbt-SCALA-2.10/ FYI On Mon,

Re: Scala 2.11 default build

2016-02-01 Thread Steve Loughran
On 30 Jan 2016, at 08:22, Reynold Xin mailto:r...@databricks.com>> wrote: FYI - I just merged Josh's pull request to switch to Scala 2.11 as the default build. https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10608 does this mean that Spark 2.10 compatibility & testing are no longer needed?

Re: Scala 2.11 default build

2016-01-30 Thread Ted Yu
Does this mean the following Jenkins builds can be disabled ? https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/view/Spark%20QA%20Compile/job/SPARK-master-COMPILE-MAVEN-SCALA-2.11/ https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/view/Spark%20QA%20Compile/job/SPARK-master-COMPILE-sbt-SCALA-2.11/ Cheers On Sat, Jan 3

Re: Scala 2.11 default build

2016-01-30 Thread Driesprong, Fokko
Nice, good work! I've been using a Docker container to compile against 2.11: https://github.com/fokko/docker-spark Cheers, Fokko 2016-01-30 9:22 GMT+01:00 Reynold Xin : > FYI - I just merged Josh's pull request to switch to Scala 2.11 as the > default build. > > https://github.com/apache/spark

Scala 2.11 default build

2016-01-30 Thread Reynold Xin
FYI - I just merged Josh's pull request to switch to Scala 2.11 as the default build. https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10608