Re: Scheduler question: stages with non-arithmetic numbering

2015-06-07 Thread Patrick Wendell
Hey Mike, Stage ID's are not guaranteed to be sequential because of the way the DAG scheduler works (only increasing). In some cases stage ID numbers are skipped when stages are generated. Any stage/ID that appears in the Spark UI is an actual stage, so if you see ID's in there, but they are not

Re: Scheduler question: stages with non-arithmetic numbering

2015-06-07 Thread Akhil Das
Are you seeing the same behavior on the driver UI? (that running on port 4040), If you click on the stage id header you can sort the stages based on IDs. Thanks Best Regards On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Mike Hynes <91m...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi folks, > > When I look at the output logs for a

Scheduler question: stages with non-arithmetic numbering

2015-06-05 Thread Mike Hynes
Hi folks, When I look at the output logs for an iterative Spark program, I see that the stage IDs are not arithmetically numbered---that is, there are gaps between stages and I might find log information about Stage 0, 1,2, 5, but not 3 or 4. As an example, the output from the Spark logs below sh