Re: Enhancer engine deps problem for releases

Hi Fabian, do you think that would also mean to change the package structure/module names of those engine or do you think it is OK for any EnhancementEngine that is managed by the Stanbol Community to use "org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engine.{engine-name}" as artifactId and package name. Regardles

Jenkins build is back to stable : stanbol-trunk-1.6 #1089

See

Jenkins build is back to stable : stanbol-trunk-1.6 » Apache Stanbol Integration Tests #1089

See

Re: Future of Clerezza and Stanbol

Comments inline... On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote: > Ok, sorry for jumping into this discussion so lately. I've been having > quite some discussion on the matter here at apacheconeu. Also I had > prositive feedback from my resentation of Clerezza yesterday. > > I think

Jenkins build became unstable: stanbol-trunk-1.6 #1088

See

Re: java.lang.LinkageError for javax.xml.stream.XMLStreamReader

Hi Rupert, Thanks for your reply. The problem is that it's not my bundle. It is one of the Apache Chemistry bundles i.e the OpenCMIS Client Bindings Implementation. So, I cannot interfere in that. I think I should try to embed Chemistry dependencies into my own module. If you have any other pract

Re: User story: Don't want to lose the semantic information I already have inside my CMS

Hi Gabriel, Currently, the component getting documents from a CMIS repository and sending them to the Contenthub is the CMISContenthubFeeder[1] which is a CMIS based implementation of ContenthubFeeder[2] interface. Actually, this interface and its implementations are open to improve based on the r

Future of Clerezza and Stanbol

Ok, sorry for jumping into this discussion so lately. I've been having quite some discussion on the matter here at apacheconeu. Also I had prositive feedback from my resentation of Clerezza yesterday. I think two things: - For high level platform component it is often not clear if the fit better i

Re: Contenthub release

Hi Fabian, My intention is also to go on like that. Best, Suat On 11/8/2012 1:35 PM, Fabian Christ wrote: > Hi Suat, > > thanks. I think it would be great to have a Contenthub release before the > branch of the 2-layer architecture is merged to the trunk. > > Best, > - Fabian > > > 2012/11/8 Su

Re: RAT check for ontologymanager, rules, reasoners

Hi Alessandro, we do not have any concrete time pressure but we should catch up on this and get the releases flowing. - Fabian 2012/11/8 Alessandro Adamou > Hi Fabian, I'll be off from now till Sunday, so I can check for the > Ontologymanager RAT on Monday. > > Thanks, > > Alessandro > > > >

Re: Contenthub release

Hi Suat, thanks. I think it would be great to have a Contenthub release before the branch of the 2-layer architecture is merged to the trunk. Best, - Fabian 2012/11/8 Suat Gonul > Hi Fabian, > > Ok, I will go over the dependency versions. Currently, I have some local > changes and there are

Re: User story: Don't want to lose the semantic information I already have inside my CMS

Hi Rüdiger, RDFa extraction from HTML is part of the htmlextractor engine in Stanbol. Iwould welcome it if you could test it with yourOpenCms docs. Best regards, Walter Rüdiger Kurz wrote: Hi Staboler, during ApacheCon in Sinsheim I had some interesting conversations with Fabian, Rupert a

Re: Contenthub release

Hi Fabian, Ok, I will go over the dependency versions. Currently, I have some local changes and there are some other minor issues that I would like take care before the release. Once those changes are done, we can go for a release. Best, Suat On 11/8/2012 11:54 AM, Fabian Christ wrote: > Hi, > >

Re: RAT check for ontologymanager, rules, reasoners

Hi Fabian, I'll be off from now till Sunday, so I can check for the Ontologymanager RAT on Monday. Thanks, Alessandro On 11/8/12 10:00 AM, Fabian Christ wrote: Hi, in order to do releases of all the great stuff that was developed the last months, we have to ensure that the licenses are all

Re: Enhancer engine deps problem for releases

Sounds reasonable to me. +1 for refactorings that improve the release flow and lower the maintenance burden. 2012/11/8 Fabian Christ : > Hi, > > I am investigating the current SNAPSHOT deps of the Stanbol components in > order to find out what can be released and in which order. > > In the enhance

Enhancer engine deps problem for releases

Hi, I am investigating the current SNAPSHOT deps of the Stanbol components in order to find out what can be released and in which order. In the enhancer we have the problematic situation that we have enhancement engines that rely on other components, like the refactor engine that relies on rules.

Re: User story: Don't want to lose the semantic information I already have inside my CMS

Hello, I have a related question and suggestion. We are heavily using metadata in our CMS and considering to use Stanbol as a semantic extension and enrichment for the already stored metadata. Seems CMIS-RDF mapping stores only hardcoded set of CMIS object properties (see the CMSAdapterVocabulary

Re: User story: Don't want to lose the semantic information I already have inside my CMS

Hi Rüdiger, thank you for bringing this up. Yes, we should reshape our view on traditional CMS and not only focus on plain text without any metadata. We have to think about the right ways to ensure that we do "never lose any semantics", like in "never lose content". Best, - Fabian 2012/11/8 Rü

Re: Manually create a Vocabulary / Ontology

Hi, I have neve tryed, but just a long shot worth to try - you can create RDF with Protege and then import it into the stanbol semantic store. Just first it could be useful to get its basic classes to start with. Best regards GAbriel On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Rüdiger Kurz wr

Contenthub release

Hi, I started to check the Contenthub for releasability. The RAT check is fine now and the resulting source package, too. I had a look at the SNAPSHOT deps and found the ones below. Could the authors of the Contenthub please check if these SNAPSHOT deps are correct and required? I just wanted to

Manually create a Vocabulary / Ontology

Hi all, Having a simple UI providing the creation of individual entities that can be used by Stanbol would be really helpful also for small and medium "Use Cases" (ca. 100 categories in a hierarchy) regards Rüdiger

User story: Don't want to lose the semantic information I already have inside my CMS

Hi Staboler, during ApacheCon in Sinsheim I had some interesting conversations with Fabian, Rupert and Anil as result I want to summarize one of the discussions as an user story telling a typical requirement for us as CMS provider. Talking about traditional Content Management Systems and ass

RAT check for ontologymanager, rules, reasoners

Hi, in order to do releases of all the great stuff that was developed the last months, we have to ensure that the licenses are all checked. As you know, we use the RAT tool for this. I would like to ask the authors of the OntologyManager, Rules and Reasoners components to check that mvn clean in