Hi Rupert,
I have just committed a fix for the broken HTML interface of Contenthub
and have no other pending changes.
Best,
Suat
On 3/21/2013 16:47, Rupert Westenthaler wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to propose to make an other round of releases mainly
> because of the update of Solr 3.6.1 to
2013/3/21 Rupert Westenthaler :
> For the enhancer and enhancement-engines there do exist own branches
> that will be used for the according releases.
Right, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-982.
--
Fabian
http://twitter.com/fctwitt
thanks Rupert, big +1 for pushing this release from me.
Tommaso
2013/3/21 Rupert Westenthaler
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to propose to make an other round of releases mainly
> because of the update of Solr 3.6.1 to Solr 4.1, but also to release a
> lot of other recent improvements.
>
> AFAIK on
Hi all,
I would like to propose to make an other round of releases mainly
because of the update of Solr 3.6.1 to Solr 4.1, but also to release a
lot of other recent improvements.
AFAIK only modules under commons had considerable API changes. Because
of that I would suggest to go for
* parent pom
2012/10/16 Alessandro Adamou :
> Hi,
>
> I have a question on the release policy.
>
> The criterion for releasing a standalone module is that it has to be working
> on the latest launcher released (the 0.9.0-incubating one iirc)? Or can we
> assume it to be working on a compiled launcher from a cer
Hi,
I have a question on the release policy.
The criterion for releasing a standalone module is that it has to be
working on the latest launcher released (the 0.9.0-incubating one iirc)?
Or can we assume it to be working on a compiled launcher from a certain
more recent trunk revision?
If s
>>
>> SemanticIndexes do have states: UNINT, INDEXING are used during the
>> initial indexing state. ACTIVE means that the index is in normal
>> operation and finally REINDEXING is used after an *epoch* change of
>> the IndexingSource. In this state the SemanticIndex can still be used
>> (with the
Hi Rupert,
On 10/13/2012 11:23 AM, Rupert Westenthaler wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This mail tries to provide an Overview about the Stanbol Semantic
> Indexing module that covers the generalized parts of the architecture
> described by STANBOL-471 and con be found in the
> "contenthub-two-layered-structu
Hi all
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 5:48 PM, aj...@virginia.edu wrote:
> Thanks for that detailed answer. Don't worry, I understand that the notion of
> yard is specific to the EntityHub-- I was just using it as an analogy.
>
The current Entityhub Yard implementations will be used as backend for
Sem
Hi all,
This mail tries to provide an Overview about the Stanbol Semantic
Indexing module that covers the generalized parts of the architecture
described by STANBOL-471 and con be found in the
"contenthub-two-layered-structure" in the
"org.apache.stanbol.commons.semanticindex" module.
The remaini
Excellent and thank you, I was stuck on a thing device all day :).
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 12, 2012, at 5:27 PM, Suat Gonul wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/12/2012 5:57 PM, aj...@virginia.edu wrote:
>> Do I understand rightly that one eventual consequence of this architecture
>> will be that content
Thanks for that detailed answer. Don't worry, I understand that the notion of
yard is specific to the EntityHub-- I was just using it as an analogy.
I do have a further question about general architecture: there exists currently
a CMSAdaptor service that aims to map content repositories and sem
Hi,
On 10/12/2012 5:57 PM, aj...@virginia.edu wrote:
> Do I understand rightly that one eventual consequence of this architecture
> will be that content items might be stored in some external service with a
> standardized interface (say, a JCR repository) and semantic-indexed into
> another ext
Do I understand rightly that one eventual consequence of this architecture will
be that content items might be stored in some external service with a
standardized interface (say, a JCR repository) and semantic-indexed into
another external service?
The diagram attached to the main issue shows S
Hi Stephane,
The parent issue for this structure is STANBOL-471[1]. You can find an
image within that issue representing the general structure offered by the
2-layered approach. The parent issue has some sub-issues. Especially, in
STANBOL-498 and STANBOL-499, you can find detailed information rega
Hi Suat,
Can I ask you to point me to some doc about the 2-layer service? What
is its purpose? And another question is about the solr version used,
which one is it?
Cheers,
Stephane
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 12, 2012, at 1:00 PM, Suat Gonul wrote:
> Hi Fabian,
>
> I am planning to make a re
Hi Fabian,
the ontology manager could use a release, there are many new features
since 0.9.0-incubating.
plus, there's the OntoNet API renaming issue underway, so perhaps this
could be an intermediate release with both APIs for some backwards
compatibility, and then a further release will ph
Hi Fabian,
I am planning to make a release for Contenthub. We have done some
updates on the this component in the "trunk" since the 0.9.0-incubating
release. However, as you know there is also a new structure for
Contenthub in the "contenthub-two-layered-branch". Although, the work in
the branch
Hi,
I am investigating the components that should go for a release in the
near future. We should try to bring as much components to a 1.0 status
as possible. After graduation it would be a good sign to start and
establish a release cycle.
My first release candidate would be the Enhancer with all
19 matches
Mail list logo
