RE: svn commit: r646002 - /stdcxx/trunk/util/output.cpp

2008-04-08 Thread Travis Vitek
>Andrew Black wrote: > >Not a whole lot of work it seems. > >I've been looking into this problem this afternoon, and I believe I've >determined a solution. > >The initial issue (which Farid spotted) was that windows has an fread >behavior which differers in subtle ways from that on unix systems.

Re: svn commit: r646002 - /stdcxx/trunk/util/output.cpp

2008-04-08 Thread Andrew Black
Not a whole lot of work it seems. I've been looking into this problem this afternoon, and I believe I've determined a solution. The initial issue (which Farid spotted) was that windows has an fread behavior which differers in subtle ways from that on unix systems. In particular, it performs CRLF

RE: svn commit: r646002 - /stdcxx/trunk/util/output.cpp

2008-04-08 Thread Travis Vitek
>Eric Lemings wrote: > >Does this mean we have no solution for resolving this issue (i.e. >back to Square One as it were)? It's currently classified as one >of two Critical issues for 4.2.1 and Andrew's last comment is >"Further work is necessary". Question is, how much work? > >Thanks, >Brad

RE: svn commit: r646002 - /stdcxx/trunk/util/output.cpp

2008-04-08 Thread Eric Lemings
Does this mean we have no solution for resolving this issue (i.e. back to Square One as it were)? It's currently classified as one of two Critical issues for 4.2.1 and Andrew's last comment is "Further work is necessary". Question is, how much work? Thanks, Brad. > -Original Message-