I did debug and optimize builds on RH5, Sol10, and HP-UX 11.31 and they
all built fine (unless I overlooked something).
Will double-check.
Brad.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 9:35 PM
To:
I double-checked on RH5 and HP-UX. Looks good to me. What error did
you get?
Brad.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Lemings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 9:30 AM
To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Subject: RE: svn commit: r675315 -
I'm porting the traits to the EDG compiler, and I'm running into
failures in the test suite. Here is a simple testcase to illustrate...
$ cat t.cpp eccp t.cpp
template int N
struct S
{
};
const bool a = __has_trivial_constructor( S1 );
t.cpp, line 6: error: an incomplete class
-Original Message-
From: Eric Lemings
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 1:01 PM
To: 'dev@stdcxx.apache.org'
Subject: RE: Potential eccp-3.9 bug
-Original Message-
From: Travis Vitek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 11:41 AM
To:
Travis Vitek wrote:
I'm porting the traits to the EDG compiler, and I'm running into
failures in the test suite. Here is a simple testcase to illustrate...
$ cat t.cpp eccp t.cpp
template int N
struct S
{
};
const bool a = __has_trivial_constructor( S1 );
t.cpp, line 6: error:
Anyone else seeing major delays in list mail delivery? I sent
a response to Travis' post Re: Potential eccp-3.9 bug at 3:36
MDT. It's now 3:53 and I still don't see it (I do see it in
archives: http://markmail.org/message/35nmnhmbrlysknhv).
I wonder if the problem is on our end at Rogue Wave?
For the record, this just now showed up in my inbox. It's 4:23PM,
a full 30 minutes after I sent it (as the timestamp indicates)...
Original Message
Subject: email delays?
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 15:53:16 -0600
From: Martin Sebor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Martin Sebor wrote:
Anyone else seeing major delays in list mail delivery? I sent
a response to Travis' post Re: Potential eccp-3.9 bug at 3:36
MDT. It's now 3:53 and I still don't see it (I do see it in
archives: http://markmail.org/message/35nmnhmbrlysknhv).
I wonder if the problem is on
Travis Vitek wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
Anyone else seeing major delays in list mail delivery? I sent
a response to Travis' post Re: Potential eccp-3.9 bug at 3:36
MDT. It's now 3:53 and I still don't see it (I do see it in
archives: http://markmail.org/message/35nmnhmbrlysknhv).
I wonder
Martin Sebor wrote:
Travis Vitek wrote:
I'm porting the traits to the EDG compiler, and I'm running into
failures in the test suite. Here is a simple testcase to
illustrate...
$ cat t.cpp eccp t.cpp
template int N
struct S
{
};
const bool a =
Travis Vitek wrote:
[...]
The problem is that many of the trait tests do this type of
thing. I can work around this pretty easily by explicitly
instantating each template in each test, but this is tedious
(there are many).
I'm not sure I understand why you are even considering working
This change makes it possible to enable stdcxx C++ 0x extensions
by using the -std=c++0x (or -std=gnu++0x) gcc command line option.
Specifically, it's possible to use these extensions with a library
configured w/o the option simply by setting CXXOPTS=-std=c++0x on
the make command line.
Travis Vitek wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
Travis Vitek wrote:
Not always. If the template is instantiated the error would
not be seen.
The reason I ask is because I couldn't get even a simple SFINAE
test program to compile. I think the program is well-formed even
though gcc 4.3.0 chokes
13 matches
Mail list logo
