2011/6/27 "C. Bergström" :
> Your false statements are annoying and unnecessary.
I deeply regret that I am annoying you.
> Please don't avoid the question as I'm trying to help review your changes.
> Either publicly or privately email which patch fixes which Perennial test.
> (If in fact you'v
On 06/27/11 01:17 AM, Stefan Teleman wrote:
2011/6/26 "C. Bergström":
PathScale has a Perennial license and feel free to privately email which
issues the patches specifically fix.
Your false statements are annoying and unnecessary.
Please don't avoid the question as I'm trying to help review
2011/6/26 "C. Bergström" :
> PathScale has a Perennial license and feel free to privately email which
> issues the patches specifically fix.
Great, then PathScale can run the Perennial C++ validation tests on
PathScale's recently published stdcxx fork.
I looked at the github code published by Pa
On 06/26/11 10:31 PM, Stefan Teleman wrote:
On 2011/6/26 "C. Bergström" wrote:
Do any of your patches fix these and if so which one(s)? Do you have
reduced test cases or which test suite?
Yes, the vast majority of the patches are about C++2003 conformance.
C++VS - Perennial C++ Validation
On 2011/6/26 "C. Bergström" wrote:
> Do any of your patches fix these and if so which one(s)? Do you have
> reduced test cases or which test suite?
Yes, the vast majority of the patches are about C++2003 conformance.
C++VS - Perennial C++ Validation Suite (CPPVS)
http://www.peren.com/pages/cp
