Re: [jira] Commented: (STDCXX-563) split up rw/_mutex.h

2008-03-30 Thread Martin Sebor
Eric Lemings wrote: -Original Message- From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 2:50 PM To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (STDCXX-563) split up rw/_mutex.h ... Right. IMO, we should go with

RE: [jira] Commented: (STDCXX-563) split up rw/_mutex.h

2008-03-27 Thread Eric Lemings
> -Original Message- > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor > Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 2:50 PM > To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org > Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (STDCXX-563) split up rw/_mutex.h > ... > > Right. IMO, we sho

Re: [jira] Commented: (STDCXX-563) split up rw/_mutex.h

2008-03-27 Thread Martin Sebor
Travis Vitek wrote: Martin Sebor wrote: Here are some observations and suggestions regarding the patch: # Underscores separating components of file names should be replaced with dashes for consistency with the {{rw/_config-*.h}} headers. # There's a typo in the name of {{_atomic_aplha.h}}. I

RE: [jira] Commented: (STDCXX-563) split up rw/_mutex.h

2008-03-27 Thread Travis Vitek
> > > >Martin Sebor wrote: > >Here are some observations and suggestions regarding the patch: > ># Underscores separating components of file names should be replaced with > dashes for consistency with the {{rw/_config-*.h}} headers. ># There's a typo in the name of {{_atomic_aplha.h}}. I suspect t