On 06/26/11 10:31 PM, Stefan Teleman wrote:
On 2011/6/26 C. Bergströmcbergst...@pathscale.com wrote:
Do any of your patches fix these and if so which one(s)? Do you have
reduced test cases or which test suite?
Yes, the vast majority of the patches are about C++2003 conformance.
C++VS -
2011/6/26 C. Bergström cbergst...@pathscale.com:
PathScale has a Perennial license and feel free to privately email which
issues the patches specifically fix.
Great, then PathScale can run the Perennial C++ validation tests on
PathScale's recently published stdcxx fork.
I looked at the github
On 06/27/11 01:17 AM, Stefan Teleman wrote:
2011/6/26 C. Bergströmcbergst...@pathscale.com:
PathScale has a Perennial license and feel free to privately email which
issues the patches specifically fix.
Your false statements are annoying and unnecessary.
Please don't avoid the question as
2011/6/27 C. Bergström cbergst...@pathscale.com:
Your false statements are annoying and unnecessary.
I deeply regret that I am annoying you.
Please don't avoid the question as I'm trying to help review your changes.
Either publicly or privately email which patch fixes which Perennial test.
On 06/26/11 11:23 AM, Stefan Teleman wrote:
On 2011/6/17 C. Bergströmcbergst...@pathscale.com wrote:
I hope we can also take a look at the Solaris and Windows patches :)
You can svn co all the stdcxx Solaris patches from here:
http://kdesolaris-svn.cvsdude.com/trunk/STDCXX/4.2.1/
The
2011/6/26 C. Bergström cbergst...@pathscale.com:
The last time we checked the patches they caused some boost regressions so
please make sure to run the boost test suite.
We don't run the Boost tests to validate the 2003 C++ Standard. We run
the 2003 C++ Standard validation tests. If strict
Hi all
Hi,
1) better cmake build system (Actually this has nothing to do with
Apache or the current build system.)
2) Faster code review, QA and easier contribution process (Only the last
part is slowed down by Apache)
3) Actively maintained (To start just bug fixes, better support for
On 06/17/11 09:54 PM, Wojciech Meyer wrote:
Hi all
Hi,
1) better cmake build system (Actually this has nothing to do with
Apache or the current build system.)
2) Faster code review, QA and easier contribution process (Only the last
part is slowed down by Apache)
3) Actively maintained (To
