gstein commented on issue #39:
URL: https://github.com/apache/steve/issues/39#issuecomment-2686525945
Oh. Whoops. That was from my work accept either JSON or txt inputs. I'll
take a look. Thanks!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, p
Humbedooh commented on issue #27:
URL: https://github.com/apache/steve/issues/27#issuecomment-2685510306
If you keep a copy of the whole database around, you could reverse-engineer
that, yes. If you only keep the exported ballots, as we do at the ASF, you
cannot map a ballot back to an indi
tisonkun commented on issue #27:
URL: https://github.com/apache/steve/issues/27#issuecomment-2685549849
Good to know.
Sorry to repeat the question: then how do we ensure that every ballot comes
from a unique verified member? Or we trust the ballot ID generating logic that
every ID mu
tisonkun commented on issue #27:
URL: https://github.com/apache/steve/issues/27#issuecomment-2685487613
@Humbedooh Thanks for your information!
> the vote monitors and admins can extract the final ballots for record
keeping, but there is nothing in those records that can be reverse-en
sebbASF commented on issue #35:
URL: https://github.com/apache/steve/issues/35#issuecomment-2684746317
FTR, this was noticed because pylint complained that the field was not used.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHu
Humbedooh closed issue #35: Code does not agree with documentation
URL: https://github.com/apache/steve/issues/35
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe
Humbedooh commented on issue #35:
URL: https://github.com/apache/steve/issues/35#issuecomment-2684633317
That was an oversight, fixed in 82c0c1932f325838859a5d3b912179c207fe36ed
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
