[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1859?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15313748#comment-15313748
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1859:
---
Github user arunmahadevan commented on the
Github user arunmahadevan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1437
@abhishej This will be part of the next release i.e. 1.0.2. If you want it
now, you could clone the 1.0.x branch (or the 1.0.1 tag and cherry-pick the
commit). You can build the distribution by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1859?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15313721#comment-15313721
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1859:
---
Github user abhishej commented on the issue
Github user abhishej commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1437
How can we get this patch.
We have storm 1.0.1 release deployed in current production environment, and
has the same issue.
Can you please provide the link for the patch, or steps to generate
Github user arunmahadevan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1453#discussion_r65659063
--- Diff:
storm-core/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/topology/WindowedBoltExecutor.java ---
@@ -284,6 +298,10 @@ public void cleanup() {
@Overri
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15313613#comment-15313613
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1873:
---
Github user arunmahadevan commented on a di
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15313589#comment-15313589
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1723:
---
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the is
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1460
Fixed whitespaces, rebased and squashed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15313561#comment-15313561
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1723:
---
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the is
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1460
whitespace again. I'll take care of this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15313556#comment-15313556
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1723:
---
GitHub user HeartSaVioR opened a pull reque
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15313557#comment-15313557
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1723:
---
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the is
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1352
Never mind. Pull request for master is here: #1460.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
GitHub user HeartSaVioR opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1460
STORM-1723 Introduce ClusterMetricsConsumer
Pull request for 1.x is here: #1352
* ClusterMetricsConsumer publishes cluster-side related metrics into
consumers
* like MetricsConsu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1875?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15313526#comment-15313526
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1875:
---
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the is
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1459
One other way without breaking compatibility but not beauty is adding some
utility methods to AbstractRedisBolt like,
```
public JedisCluster asJedisCluster(JedisCommands instance) t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1875?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15313522#comment-15313522
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1875:
---
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the is
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1459
The problem is actually not simple. The blocking point is JedisCommands
interface, not config.
JedisCommands exposes operations which use only single key. Since some
multiple keys operations
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15313484#comment-15313484
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1723:
---
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the is
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1352
@harshach @hmcl Addressed review comments, and rebased with commits
squashed.
I feel applying this to 1.0.x seems to be against semantic versioning, so I
would not address it.
Do we want
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15313462#comment-15313462
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1723:
---
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on a diff
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1352#discussion_r65647236
--- Diff: storm-core/src/clj/org/apache/storm/daemon/nimbus.clj ---
@@ -1355,48 +1366,843 @@
(defmethod blob-sync :local [conf nimbus]
nil)
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1352#discussion_r65641418
--- Diff: storm-core/src/clj/org/apache/storm/daemon/nimbus.clj ---
@@ -1355,48 +1366,843 @@
(defmethod blob-sync :local [conf nimbus]
nil)
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1352#discussion_r65641444
--- Diff: storm-core/src/clj/org/apache/storm/daemon/nimbus.clj ---
@@ -1355,48 +1366,843 @@
(defmethod blob-sync :local [conf nimbus]
nil)
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1442
@csivaguru Missing one more thing, you need to submit pull request against
master unless there's specific reason to not do. You may want to submit
additional pull requests against version branche
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1442
@csivaguru Could you file an issue and link it? I think it's not trivial
fix so we would want to track.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
darion,
I'm not sure I'm catching what you mean correctly.
Most of recent projects are trying to respect semantic versioning. Please
refer here for more details. http://semver.org/
Before Storm 0.10.0, I didn't see the release policy or theory Apache Storm
are respecting. New features and improve
Hi
I have a question regarding the use of Storm with a cache. Hopefully someone
can help me.
I have a Kafka spout which reads JSON messages from a Kafka topic. The messages
contain an ID, a timestamp and "start" or "end".
The next step is a bolt, which stores the "start" messages in Redis and
Github user csivaguru commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1442
@harshach @hmcl @HeartSaVioR Can I get a review on this change?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15312701#comment-15312701
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1136:
---
Github user priyank5485 commented on a diff
Github user priyank5485 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1451#discussion_r65582081
--- Diff:
external/storm-kafka-monitor/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/kafka/monitor/KafkaOffsetLagUtil.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,374 @@
+/*
+ * License
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15312693#comment-15312693
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1136:
---
Github user priyank5485 commented on a diff
Github user priyank5485 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1451#discussion_r65581276
--- Diff:
external/storm-kafka-monitor/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/kafka/monitor/KafkaOffsetLagUtil.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,374 @@
+/*
+ * License
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15312688#comment-15312688
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1873:
---
Github user kosii commented on a diff in th
Github user kosii commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1453#discussion_r65580954
--- Diff:
storm-core/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/topology/WindowedBoltExecutor.java ---
@@ -284,6 +298,10 @@ public void cleanup() {
@Override
Github user hmcl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1451#discussion_r65576345
--- Diff:
external/storm-kafka-monitor/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/kafka/monitor/KafkaOffsetLagUtil.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,374 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15312644#comment-15312644
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1136:
---
Github user hmcl commented on a diff in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15312639#comment-15312639
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1136:
---
Github user hmcl commented on a diff in the
Github user hmcl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1451#discussion_r65576093
--- Diff:
external/storm-kafka-monitor/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/kafka/monitor/KafkaOffsetLagUtil.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,374 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15312603#comment-15312603
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-822:
--
Github user hmcl commented on the issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15312600#comment-15312600
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1873:
---
Github user arunmahadevan commented on a di
Github user arunmahadevan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1453#discussion_r65573427
--- Diff:
storm-core/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/topology/base/BaseWindowedBolt.java ---
@@ -255,6 +255,22 @@ public BaseWindowedBolt withTimestampField(St
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15312613#comment-15312613
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1873:
---
Github user arunmahadevan commented on a di
Github user arunmahadevan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1453#discussion_r65574257
--- Diff:
storm-core/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/topology/WindowedBoltExecutor.java ---
@@ -284,6 +298,10 @@ public void cleanup() {
@Overri
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15312605#comment-15312605
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1873:
---
Github user arunmahadevan commented on a di
Github user arunmahadevan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1453#discussion_r65573649
--- Diff:
storm-core/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/topology/base/BaseWindowedBolt.java ---
@@ -255,6 +255,22 @@ public BaseWindowedBolt withTimestampField(St
Github user hmcl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1131
@jianbzhou thanks. Looking at it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15312590#comment-15312590
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1838:
---
Github user hmcl commented on the issue:
Github user hmcl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1419
@flisky some stuff came up. Apologies for the delay in my response. I will
get back to you today or tomorrow as I am working on this now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this ema
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15312587#comment-15312587
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1723:
---
Github user hmcl commented on the issue:
Github user hmcl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1352
+1. I am also in favor of making cluster summary modular.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user kosii commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1453
I updated the docs, and I'm going to work on the unit tests while the patch
is being reviewed
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15312508#comment-15312508
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1873:
---
Github user kosii commented on the issue:
Github user arunmahadevan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1458
@sakanaou Thanks for the patch.
Can you also add an example flux topology with an IStatefulBolt similar to
to existing ones under
https://github.com/apache/storm/tree/master/external/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15312444#comment-15312444
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1873:
---
Github user kosii commented on a diff in th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15312445#comment-15312445
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1878:
---
Github user arunmahadevan commented on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15312443#comment-15312443
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1873:
---
Github user kosii commented on a diff in th
Github user kosii commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1453#discussion_r65557613
--- Diff: storm-core/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/Config.java ---
@@ -1872,6 +1872,13 @@
@isString
public static final String TOPOLOGY_BOLTS_TUPLE_
Github user kosii commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1453#discussion_r65557653
--- Diff:
storm-core/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/topology/WindowedBoltExecutor.java ---
@@ -268,8 +277,12 @@ public void execute(Tuple input) {
if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1875?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15312436#comment-15312436
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1875:
---
GitHub user darionyaphet opened a pull requ
GitHub user darionyaphet opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1459
[STORM-1875]Separate Jedis/JedisCluster Config
[STORM-1875](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1875)
Separate Jedis / JedisCluster to provide full operations for each
environm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15312426#comment-15312426
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1873:
---
Github user arunmahadevan commented on a di
Github user arunmahadevan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1453#discussion_r6185
--- Diff: storm-core/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/Config.java ---
@@ -1872,6 +1872,13 @@
@isString
public static final String TOPOLOGY_BOLT
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
darion yaphet updated STORM-1880:
-
Issue Type: New Feature (was: Bug)
> Support EXISTS Command Storm-Redis
> --
darion yaphet created STORM-1880:
Summary: Support EXISTS Command Storm-Redis
Key: STORM-1880
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1880
Project: Apache Storm
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15312301#comment-15312301
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-822:
--
Github user jianbzhou commented on the issue:
Github user jianbzhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1131
@hmcl, today we found one NullpointerException and i applied a fix as below:
In method doSeekRetriableTopicPartitions, if one partition was never
committed before one message is failed back
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15312287#comment-15312287
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1874:
---
Github user dossett commented on the issue:
Github user dossett commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1456
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15312206#comment-15312206
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1873:
---
Github user kosii commented on a diff in th
Github user kosii commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1453#discussion_r65527974
--- Diff: storm-core/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/Config.java ---
@@ -1872,6 +1872,13 @@
@isString
public static final String TOPOLOGY_BOLTS_TUPLE_
Github user flisky commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1419
friendly ping, @hmcl
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15312182#comment-15312182
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1838:
---
Github user flisky commented on the issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15312147#comment-15312147
]
Stig Rohde Døssing edited comment on STORM-1879 at 6/2/16 11:32 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15312149#comment-15312149
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1878:
---
GitHub user sakanaou opened a pull request:
GitHub user sakanaou opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1458
STORM-1878: Flux can now handle IStatefulBolts
We noticed that Flux could not yet handle IStatefulBolts in a topology
definition. With this small addition we can successfully build and deploy our
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stig Rohde Døssing updated STORM-1879:
--
Attachment: nimbus-supervisor.zip
The nimbus and supervisor logs for the period. The und
Stig Rohde Døssing created STORM-1879:
-
Summary: Supervisor may not shut down workers cleanly
Key: STORM-1879
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1879
Project: Apache Storm
I
Daniel Klessing created STORM-1878:
--
Summary: Flux does not handle stateful bolts
Key: STORM-1878
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1878
Project: Apache Storm
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15312013#comment-15312013
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1874:
---
Github user harshach commented on the issue
Github user harshach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1456
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15311941#comment-15311941
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1755:
---
Github user harshach commented on the issue
Github user harshach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1386
@abhishekagarwal87 yes. I don't have any better name in mind :) . how about
keeping kafka.version as it is for new kafka spout and adding
storm-kafka.kafka.version for the old one.
---
If your pro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15311937#comment-15311937
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1755:
---
Github user abhishekagarwal87 commented on
Github user abhishekagarwal87 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1386
@harshach do you mean to suggest something like following
```
0.8.2.1
kafka_2.10
0.9.0.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15311935#comment-15311935
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1873:
---
Github user arunmahadevan commented on the
Github user arunmahadevan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1453
I have gone through the details and have left some comments. Can you update
the
[documentation](https://github.com/apache/storm/blob/master/docs/Windowing.md)
where it references late tuples a
Hi team :In fact , I have a question about release new version . We
have received some bug fix , improvement and new features . Which one will
include in difference version ? This have some rule ? thanks :D
At 2016-06-01 17:43:54, "Jungtaek Lim" wrote:
>Hi devs,
>
>Since we're resolving some c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15311925#comment-15311925
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1755:
---
Github user harshach commented on the issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15311927#comment-15311927
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1873:
---
Github user arunmahadevan commented on a di
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15311928#comment-15311928
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1873:
---
Github user arunmahadevan commented on a di
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15311926#comment-15311926
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1873:
---
Github user arunmahadevan commented on a di
Github user harshach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1386
@abhishekagarwal87 didn't see this merged in. Instead of overriding the
kafka.version for storm-kafka lets add another param to pom.xml and keep it at
0.8.2.1 and use that as kafka version for sto
Github user arunmahadevan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1453#discussion_r65500717
--- Diff:
storm-core/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/topology/WindowedBoltExecutor.java ---
@@ -268,8 +277,12 @@ public void execute(Tuple input) {
Github user arunmahadevan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1453#discussion_r65500709
--- Diff: storm-core/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/Config.java ---
@@ -1872,6 +1872,13 @@
@isString
public static final String TOPOLOGY_BOLT
Github user arunmahadevan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1453#discussion_r65500739
--- Diff:
storm-core/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/topology/base/BaseWindowedBolt.java ---
@@ -255,6 +255,17 @@ public BaseWindowedBolt withTimestampField(St
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15311919#comment-15311919
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1723:
---
Github user harshach commented on the issue
Github user harshach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1352
+1 . If possible we should move extracting cluster summary to a common file
and use that in ui and nimbus
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15311916#comment-15311916
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1723:
---
Github user harshach commented on a diff in
Github user harshach commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1352#discussion_r65499343
--- Diff: storm-core/src/clj/org/apache/storm/daemon/nimbus.clj ---
@@ -1355,48 +1366,843 @@
(defmethod blob-sync :local [conf nimbus]
nil)
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
