[GitHub] storm issue #1608: STORM-2016 Topology submission improvement: support addin...

Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1608 Rebased with current 1.x-branch. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled

[GitHub] storm issue #1635: STORM-1434 Support the GROUP BY clause in StormSQL

Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1635 Ready to review now. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes

[GitHub] storm issue #1635: [WIP] STORM-1434 Support the GROUP BY clause in StormSQL

Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1635 Fixed handling return type of AVG(). If the type of field is a fixed number, AVG() does floor division and returns quotient, and if the type of field is a floating number, AVG() does divisio

[jira] [Commented] (STORM-1949) Backpressure can cause spout to stop emitting and stall topology

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15430073#comment-15430073 ] Alessandro Bellina commented on STORM-1949: --- I replicated a halted topology usin

[GitHub] storm issue #1592: STORM-1994: Add table with per-topology and worker resour...

Github user abellina commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1592 @HeartSaVioR I pull requested the change to 1.x. Please let me know if you have questions. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as

[GitHub] storm issue #1635: [WIP] STORM-1434 Support the GROUP BY clause in StormSQL

Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1635 I just removed `replace clojure.lang.Numbers to other implementations` from TODO because I can't find the easy way to do that. I'd like to address this as separate issue, and any ideas or sug

[GitHub] storm pull request #1641: STORM-1994: Add table with per-topology and worker...

GitHub user abellina opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1641 STORM-1994: Add table with per-topology and worker resource usage and… … components in (new) supervisor and topology pages Backport of https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1592 to 1.x b

[jira] [Updated] (STORM-1985) Provide a tool for showing and killing corrupted topology

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kamal updated STORM-1985: - Attachment: proposal_admin_tool_design.docx I tried to think over the admin tool design and put down my thoughts i

Re: Details about the Storm Scheduler

Auto scaling doesn't exist right now. And yes adding it will definitely add a lot of value On Aug 21, 2016 6:38 PM, "Aakash Khochare" wrote: Greetings, I am Aakash Khochare. I am currently a Masters student in Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore. I know that the number of worker processes to

Details about the Storm Scheduler

Greetings, I am Aakash Khochare. I am currently a Masters student in Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore. I know that the number of worker processes to be used by a topology and the number of executors can be changed using storm rebalance. However, is there any facility that does this work

[GitHub] storm pull request #1640: Fix version command in storm.cmd

GitHub user zxtwonder opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1640 Fix version command in storm.cmd Move version command from shellcommands to corecommands. VersionInfo.main() needs to be executed to print out the version information. You can merge this pull req