[GitHub] storm pull request #2419: STORM-2805: Clean up confs in TopologyBuilders

2017-11-17 Thread srdo
Github user srdo commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2419#discussion_r151632384 --- Diff: storm-server/src/test/java/org/apache/storm/scheduler/resource/strategies/scheduling/TestGenericResourceAwareStrategy.java --- @@ -129,23 +130,34 @@

[GitHub] storm pull request #2419: STORM-2805: Clean up confs in TopologyBuilders

2017-11-17 Thread srdo
Github user srdo commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2419#discussion_r151630914 --- Diff: storm-client/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/topology/TopologyBuilder.java --- @@ -562,43 +560,54 @@ private void initCommon(String id, IComponent component

[GitHub] storm pull request #2419: STORM-2805: Clean up confs in TopologyBuilders

2017-11-17 Thread srdo
Github user srdo commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2419#discussion_r151636460 --- Diff: storm-server/src/test/java/org/apache/storm/scheduler/resource/strategies/scheduling/TestGenericResourceAwareStrategy.java --- @@ -187,16 +199,21 @@

[GitHub] storm pull request #2419: STORM-2805: Clean up confs in TopologyBuilders

2017-11-17 Thread Ethanlm
Github user Ethanlm commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2419#discussion_r151697329 --- Diff: storm-client/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/trident/topology/MasterBatchCoordinator.java --- @@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ public String toString() {

[GitHub] storm pull request #2419: STORM-2805: Clean up confs in TopologyBuilders

2017-11-17 Thread revans2
Github user revans2 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2419#discussion_r151697850 --- Diff: storm-client/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/topology/TopologyBuilder.java --- @@ -562,43 +560,54 @@ private void initCommon(String id, IComponent compon

[GitHub] storm pull request #2419: STORM-2805: Clean up confs in TopologyBuilders

2017-11-17 Thread revans2
Github user revans2 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2419#discussion_r151699527 --- Diff: storm-server/src/test/java/org/apache/storm/scheduler/resource/strategies/scheduling/TestGenericResourceAwareStrategy.java --- @@ -129,23 +130,34

[GitHub] storm pull request #2419: STORM-2805: Clean up confs in TopologyBuilders

2017-11-17 Thread revans2
Github user revans2 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2419#discussion_r151699779 --- Diff: storm-client/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/trident/topology/MasterBatchCoordinator.java --- @@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ public String toString() {

[GitHub] storm pull request #2419: STORM-2805: Clean up confs in TopologyBuilders

2017-11-17 Thread revans2
Github user revans2 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2419#discussion_r151700529 --- Diff: storm-server/src/test/java/org/apache/storm/scheduler/resource/strategies/scheduling/TestGenericResourceAwareStrategy.java --- @@ -187,16 +199,21

[GitHub] storm pull request #2419: STORM-2805: Clean up confs in TopologyBuilders

2017-11-17 Thread srdo
Github user srdo commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2419#discussion_r151704811 --- Diff: storm-server/src/test/java/org/apache/storm/scheduler/resource/strategies/scheduling/TestGenericResourceAwareStrategy.java --- @@ -129,23 +130,34 @@

[GitHub] storm pull request #2419: STORM-2805: Clean up confs in TopologyBuilders

2017-11-17 Thread srdo
Github user srdo commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2419#discussion_r151707538 --- Diff: storm-server/src/test/java/org/apache/storm/scheduler/resource/strategies/scheduling/TestGenericResourceAwareStrategy.java --- @@ -187,16 +199,21 @@

[GitHub] storm issue #2419: STORM-2805: Clean up confs in TopologyBuilders

2017-11-17 Thread revans2
Github user revans2 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2419 @srdo I have fixed the issues you called out @Ethanlm I fixed the issue you saw. ---

[GitHub] storm issue #2419: STORM-2805: Clean up confs in TopologyBuilders

2017-11-17 Thread srdo
Github user srdo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2419 Thanks, +1 ---

Re: [Discuss] Release Storm 1.2.0

2017-11-17 Thread Hugo Da Cruz Louro
I am also in agreement that we should not delay the 1.2.0 release for too long, but in order to release it a few things need to be kept in mind: - If we want to avoid releasing 1.3.0 soon or at all, that means that we should include in 1.2.0 as many important features (e.g. metricsV2) as possib

[GitHub] storm issue #2419: STORM-2805: Clean up confs in TopologyBuilders

2017-11-17 Thread revans2
Github user revans2 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2419 @srdo thanks for the review you found a lot of bugs and made this a lot better. ---

[GitHub] storm issue #2419: STORM-2805: Clean up confs in TopologyBuilders

2017-11-17 Thread srdo
Github user srdo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2419 Thanks, happy to help :) ---

Re: [Discuss] Release Storm 1.2.0

2017-11-17 Thread Stig Rohde Døssing
My concern isn't really whether we keep backporting features to 1.x for now or not. I would like to see an initial release in the 2.x line soon, because master and 1.x have diverged by a good bit. I think it's to everyone's benefit if we can reduce how much work goes into backporting features. Once

Re: [Discuss] Release Storm 1.2.0

2017-11-17 Thread Alexandre Vermeerbergen
Hello Hugo, As I already posted, I was getting ready to test the upcoming RC, so yeah : as soon as I have some binaries for testing, I can run any Storm 1.2.0 preview on my pre-production (well stressed) environment. Is there some URL from where I can download such "snapshot" binaries? Best reg

Re: [Discuss] Release Storm 1.2.0

2017-11-17 Thread Jungtaek Lim
Alexandre, https://www.dropbox.com/s/mg2gnunk24oesyc/apache-storm-1.2.0-SNAPSHOT.tar.gz?dl=0 Above link is custom binary distribution of current 1.x-branch (SNAPSHOT of 1.2.0). Could you run the test in your environment first and let us know about the result? Regardless of including metrics V2 to