Hi all, thanks Elisey for submitting the SGA. It was received.
I just migrated the current code to https://github.com/apache/storm-docker and made some ASF specific updates after the code donation. I also opened a PR against the official images to transfer ownership https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/pull/16035 No idea (yet) how to edit / update the README on Dockerhub, though (didn't search how to do it). Let's see, if the docker library maintainers require us to re-do the transfer to also migrate the closed PRs / issues against the original repo. Nevertheless, I hope, that they understand my explanations regarding the new namespace apache/storm in the near future. That being said: A huge thanks to Elisey for providing us with the code as a starter for future docker images of Storm! Gruß Richard Am Dienstag, dem 09.01.2024 um 16:21 +0500 schrieb Elisey Zanko: > Hi all, > > I’ve just signed and sent the SGA. > > Let me know if you wish to switch https://hub.docker.com/_/storm to > your git repo. > Here’s how it could look > like: https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/pull/9319 > > Thanks, > Elisey > > > On 9 Jan 2024, at 15:46, Richard Zowalla <rich...@zowalla.com> > > wrote: > > > > Hey Elisey, > > > > it is described here: > > https://www.apache.org/licenses/contributor-agreements.html#submitting > > > > It basically goes to secret...@apache.org > > Subject something like: "SGA for Storm Docker". > > > > In the mail just add the signed SGA (as described under the link), > > a link to the GitHub Repo (is most likely already inside the SGA) > > and a link to this mail thread: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/34kkzbcfr4qxcxmclgqmjc08o9s28gjz > > > > Gruß > > Richard > > > > > > Am 9. Januar 2024 11:33:48 MEZ schrieb Elisey Zanko > > <elisey.za...@gmail.com>: > > > Hi Richard, > > > > > > Sounds good to me. > > > Where do I send the signed SGA and with what subject? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Elisey > > > > > > > On 9 Jan 2024, at 15:20, Richard Zowalla <r...@apache.org> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > just got a response from the incubator. > > > > > > > > What we would need from you (@Elisey) is a signed Software > > > > License > > > > Grant (SGA) [1] downloadable here [2]. > > > > > > > > It would need to follow the procedere described under "HOW-TO: > > > > SUBMITTING LICENSE AGREEMENTS AND GRANTS". > > > > > > > > Let us know, if you feel, that this would work for you. > > > > > > > > Gruß & thx > > > > Richard > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > https://www.apache.org/licenses/contributor-agreements.html#grants > > > > [2] https://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant-template.pdf > > > > > > > > > > > > Am Dienstag, dem 09.01.2024 um 09:11 +0100 schrieb Richard > > > > Zowalla: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > great news. I reached out to the ASF incubator people to > > > > > check, which > > > > > guidelines we need to follow in order to integrate / migrate > > > > > ownership > > > > > of the code (repository) to the Storm project. Let's see what > > > > > they > > > > > say > > > > > would be the best strategy (even if it is just fork and re- > > > > > license) > > > > > and > > > > > if a CLA would be required. (Side note: I can totall > > > > > understand, if > > > > > you > > > > > wouldn't want to sign one, so we hope for the best). > > > > > > > > > > It might be best to put the related Docker code into a > > > > > separate repo > > > > > under the ASF org on GitHub (apache/storm-docker), so we can > > > > > publish > > > > > under the "official" Storm Docker location and under > > > > > apache/storm on > > > > > Docker. By doing so, we can preserve git history. > > > > > > > > > > Infra told me, that it has some benefits to put it under > > > > > apache/storm > > > > > since the ASF has all the premium features (rate limit, ...) > > > > > on > > > > > Dockerhub. Sadly, there seems to be no easy way to do an > > > > > automatic > > > > > "redirect" (similar to a Maven relocation) on Dockerhub. > > > > > > > > > > Gruß > > > > > Richard > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Am Montag, dem 08.01.2024 um 11:47 +0000 schrieb Julien > > > > > Nioche: > > > > > > Hi Elisey, > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your email and great to hear that you'd be happy > > > > > > to > > > > > > contribute > > > > > > the code. I am CCing the Storm dev list so that our > > > > > > discussion is > > > > > > in > > > > > > the > > > > > > open and members of the community can contribute to it. > > > > > > > > > > > > For the people on dev@, Elisey is the author of the Storm > > > > > > images on > > > > > > Docker > > > > > > <https://hub.docker.com/_/storm> that many of us in the > > > > > > community > > > > > > have been > > > > > > using, let's thank him for that! See my message with him > > > > > > below as > > > > > > well as > > > > > > STORM-4014 > > > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-4014> > > > > > > > > > > > > @Elisey - we might need you to sign a contributor agreement > > > > > > < > > > > > > https://www.apache.org/licenses/contributor-agreements.html> > > > > > > beforehand > > > > > > and ideally change the license to be ASF v2. Would that be > > > > > > OK? > > > > > > > > > > > > I initially thought we'd have the Docker files as part of > > > > > > the Storm > > > > > > repo > > > > > > but maybe it would be simpler to have a separate repository > > > > > > for it > > > > > > and copy > > > > > > the whole git history from your repository. > > > > > > We already have the following on Dockerhub -> > > > > > > https://hub.docker.com/repository/docker/apache/storm/general > > > > > > , not > > > > > > sure how > > > > > > that would work with the 'official images'. > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > > > > > Julien > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 at 12:00, Elisey Zanko > > > > > > <elisey.za...@gmail.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Julien, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I’d be happy to contribute the image! > > > > > > > Especially because I no longer actively use it myself and > > > > > > > don’t > > > > > > > have much > > > > > > > time to maintain it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you haven’t seen it already I’d suggest you to have a > > > > > > > look at > > > > > > > “Maintainership” section of the Docker Official Images > > > > > > > repo: > > > > > > > https://github.com/docker-library/official-images#maintainership > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From that doc I think the most important part is: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When taking over an existing repository, please ensure > > > > > > > > that the > > > > > > > > entire > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Git history of the original repository is kept in the new > > > > > > > upstream-maintained repository to make sure the review > > > > > > > process > > > > > > > isn't > > > > > > > stalled during the transition. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let me know how would you prefer to transfer the repo to > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > upstream > > > > > > > (e.g., fork, copy commits or move ownership). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Once transferred we’ll need to create a commit to > > > > > > > https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/blob/master/library/storm > > > > > > > to update image maintainers and git repo. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > Elisey > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 4 Jan 2024, at 19:56, Julien Nioche > > > > > > > > <jul...@digitalpebble.com> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Elisey, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Happy New Year! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am a committer on the Apache Storm project and have > > > > > > > > been > > > > > > > > using > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > images you created and maintained for a while, in > > > > > > > particular for > > > > > > > my > > > > > > > own > > > > > > > project StormCrawler. So a massive thank you for that, I > > > > > > > am very > > > > > > > grateful > > > > > > > for your work! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We've recently had a discussion about handling the > > > > > > > > Docker > > > > > > > > images > > > > > > > > within > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the project. We could of course start from scratch but > > > > > > > given that > > > > > > > you have > > > > > > > built them, I was wondering whether you would consider > > > > > > > contributing > > > > > > > them to > > > > > > > the project? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Given that your files are under MIT, I assume it would > > > > > > > > also be > > > > > > > > an > > > > > > > > option > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to copy them over to Storm along with the license. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Looking forward to hearing your thoughts on this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Julien Nioche > > > > > > > > Director > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > digitalpebble.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
