[GitHub] storm pull request #1675: Update

2016-09-06 Thread kamleshbhatt
GitHub user kamleshbhatt opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1675 Update Update You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/kamleshbhatt/storm master Alternatively you can review and apply these

[GitHub] storm pull request #1675: Update

2016-09-06 Thread kamleshbhatt
Github user kamleshbhatt closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1675 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] storm pull request #1677: STORM-1985: Admin Commands

2016-09-06 Thread kamleshbhatt
GitHub user kamleshbhatt opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1677 STORM-1985: Admin Commands You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/kamleshbhatt/storm master Alternatively you can review and

[GitHub] storm issue #1677: STORM-1985: Admin Commands

2016-09-15 Thread kamleshbhatt
Github user kamleshbhatt commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1677 Applied the review comments. Please take a look. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have

[GitHub] storm pull request #1677: STORM-1985: Admin Commands

2016-09-23 Thread kamleshbhatt
Github user kamleshbhatt commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1677#discussion_r80293802 --- Diff: bin/storm.py --- @@ -572,6 +572,22 @@ def kill_workers(*args): jvmtype="-client", extrajars=[USE

[GitHub] storm pull request #1677: STORM-1985: Admin Commands

2016-09-23 Thread kamleshbhatt
Github user kamleshbhatt commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1677#discussion_r80294599 --- Diff: storm-core/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/command/AdminCommands.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,133 @@ +/** + * Licensed to the Apache Software

[GitHub] storm pull request #1677: STORM-1985: Admin Commands

2016-09-23 Thread kamleshbhatt
Github user kamleshbhatt commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1677#discussion_r80296458 --- Diff: storm-core/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/command/AdminCommands.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,133 @@ +/** + * Licensed to the Apache Software

[GitHub] storm pull request #1677: STORM-1985: Admin Commands

2016-10-02 Thread kamleshbhatt
Github user kamleshbhatt commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1677#discussion_r81474369 --- Diff: storm-core/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/command/AdminCommands.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,133 @@ +/** + * Licensed to the Apache Software

[GitHub] storm issue #1677: STORM-1985: Admin Commands

2016-10-21 Thread kamleshbhatt
Github user kamleshbhatt commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1677 @revans2 Thanks for reviewing the changes. Resolved the merge conflict. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] storm pull request #1814: STORM-1308

2016-12-05 Thread kamleshbhatt
GitHub user kamleshbhatt opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1814 STORM-1308 Please Review. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/kamleshbhatt/storm master Alternatively you can review and apply

[GitHub] storm issue #1814: STORM-1308

2016-12-11 Thread kamleshbhatt
Github user kamleshbhatt commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1814 Thanks for reviewing the patch @HeartSaVioR . Modified the pull request as per review comments. Please take a look. My jira id is "kbhatt". --- If your project is set up f

[GitHub] storm issue #1814: STORM-1308

2016-12-17 Thread kamleshbhatt
Github user kamleshbhatt commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1814 @HeartSaVioR Could you please review the revised pull request. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[GitHub] storm pull request #1839: STORM-1292

2016-12-23 Thread kamleshbhatt
GitHub user kamleshbhatt opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1839 STORM-1292 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/kamleshbhatt/storm storm_branch_1292 Alternatively you can review and apply

[GitHub] storm issue #1839: STORM-1292

2016-12-24 Thread kamleshbhatt
Github user kamleshbhatt commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1839 STORM-1292: port backtype.storm.messaging-test to java --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not

[GitHub] storm pull request #1839: STORM-1292

2017-01-17 Thread kamleshbhatt
Github user kamleshbhatt closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1839 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] storm pull request #1882: STORM-1292: port backtype.storm.messaging-test to ...

2017-01-17 Thread kamleshbhatt
GitHub user kamleshbhatt opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1882 STORM-1292: port backtype.storm.messaging-test to java View changes This PR is in continuation of https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1839. I have applied all review comments in this

[GitHub] storm issue #1882: STORM-1292: port backtype.storm.messaging-test to java Vi...

2017-01-18 Thread kamleshbhatt
Github user kamleshbhatt commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1882 @harshach thanks for reviewing the PR. I tried to squash the commits but not sure why it is throwing error. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your

[GitHub] storm issue #1882: STORM-1292: port backtype.storm.messaging-test to java Vi...

2017-01-19 Thread kamleshbhatt
Github user kamleshbhatt commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1882 @harshach I tried your suggestion "git rebase -i HEAD~9" and kept just one comment and put s in front of all other comments. It gives error Cannot 'squash' witho

[GitHub] storm issue #1882: STORM-1292: port backtype.storm.messaging-test to java Vi...

2017-01-19 Thread kamleshbhatt
Github user kamleshbhatt commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1882 @HeartSaVioR Applied your review comment. However not able to squash the commits. Please help on this. Once again thanks a lot for your help, always. --- If your project is set up for it

[GitHub] storm pull request #1948: Update

2017-02-20 Thread kamleshbhatt
GitHub user kamleshbhatt opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1948 Update You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/kamleshbhatt/storm master Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as

[GitHub] storm pull request #1948: Update

2017-02-20 Thread kamleshbhatt
Github user kamleshbhatt closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1948 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] storm pull request #1949: STORM-1290: port backtype.storm.local-state-test t...

2017-02-20 Thread kamleshbhatt
GitHub user kamleshbhatt opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1949 STORM-1290: port backtype.storm.local-state-test to java You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/kamleshbhatt/storm master

[GitHub] storm pull request #1949: STORM-1290: port backtype.storm.local-state-test t...

2017-02-20 Thread kamleshbhatt
Github user kamleshbhatt commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1949#discussion_r102148450 --- Diff: storm-core/test/jvm/org/apache/storm/LocalStateTest.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ +package org.apache.storm; + +import

[GitHub] storm issue #1949: STORM-1290: port backtype.storm.local-state-test to java

2017-03-12 Thread kamleshbhatt
Github user kamleshbhatt commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1949 @HeartSaVioR ,my apology for not responding to this early as some urgent travel came up for me. Thanks for reviewing the PR. As you suggested I'll apply the review comments and sub

[GitHub] storm issue #1949: STORM-1290: port backtype.storm.local-state-test to java

2017-04-08 Thread kamleshbhatt
Github user kamleshbhatt commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1949 My sincere apology for the delay on this. As you suggested I am closing this PR and submit the revised one soon. Thanks for all your help. --- If your project is set up for it, you

[GitHub] storm pull request #1949: STORM-1290: port backtype.storm.local-state-test t...

2017-04-08 Thread kamleshbhatt
Github user kamleshbhatt closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1949 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] storm pull request #2074: Storm 1290:port backtype.storm.local-state-test to...

2017-04-16 Thread kamleshbhatt
GitHub user kamleshbhatt opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2074 Storm 1290:port backtype.storm.local-state-test to java Please review. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/kamleshbhatt/storm

[GitHub] storm pull request #2074: Storm 1290:port backtype.storm.local-state-test to...

2017-04-17 Thread kamleshbhatt
Github user kamleshbhatt commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2074#discussion_r111773697 --- Diff: storm-server/src/test/java/org/apache/storm/LocalStateTest.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +package org.apache.storm; + +import

[GitHub] storm pull request #2074: Storm 1290:port backtype.storm.local-state-test to...

2017-04-18 Thread kamleshbhatt
Github user kamleshbhatt commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2074#discussion_r112118064 --- Diff: storm-server/src/test/java/org/apache/storm/LocalStateTest.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +package org.apache.storm; + +import

[GitHub] storm pull request #2074: Storm 1290:port backtype.storm.local-state-test to...

2017-04-18 Thread kamleshbhatt
Github user kamleshbhatt commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2074#discussion_r112118639 --- Diff: storm-server/src/test/java/org/apache/storm/LocalStateTest.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +package org.apache.storm; + +import

[GitHub] storm pull request #2074: Storm 1290:port backtype.storm.local-state-test to...

2017-04-18 Thread kamleshbhatt
Github user kamleshbhatt commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2074#discussion_r112118745 --- Diff: storm-server/src/test/java/org/apache/storm/LocalStateTest.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +package org.apache.storm; + +import

[GitHub] storm pull request #2074: Storm 1290:port backtype.storm.local-state-test to...

2017-04-22 Thread kamleshbhatt
Github user kamleshbhatt commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2074#discussion_r112815175 --- Diff: storm-server/src/test/java/org/apache/storm/LocalStateTest.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +package org.apache.storm; + +import

[GitHub] storm issue #2074: Storm 1290:port backtype.storm.local-state-test to java

2017-04-26 Thread kamleshbhatt
Github user kamleshbhatt commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2074 @harshach I tried multiple times but unable to squash the commits. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] storm pull request #2074: Storm 1290:port backtype.storm.local-state-test to...

2017-06-10 Thread kamleshbhatt
Github user kamleshbhatt closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2074 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] storm pull request #2154: Storm 1290:port backtype.storm.local-state-test to...

2017-06-10 Thread kamleshbhatt
GitHub user kamleshbhatt opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2154 Storm 1290:port backtype.storm.local-state-test to java These changes are in continuation of pull request https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2074 Please review. You can merge

[GitHub] storm issue #2074: Storm 1290:port backtype.storm.local-state-test to java

2017-06-10 Thread kamleshbhatt
Github user kamleshbhatt commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2074 My Apology for the delay. Applied the review comments and created a new pull request https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2154/files. Please take a look. --- If your project is

[GitHub] storm issue #2074: Storm 1290:port backtype.storm.local-state-test to java

2017-06-10 Thread kamleshbhatt
Github user kamleshbhatt commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2074 @srdo I was unable to squash the commits so created a new PR and applied all required changes. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on

[GitHub] storm issue #2074: Storm 1290:port backtype.storm.local-state-test to java

2017-06-10 Thread kamleshbhatt
Github user kamleshbhatt commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2074 @srdo Thanks for providing above steps. I applied these commands. It updated the branch STORM-1290 but doesn't allow me to reopen this PR. --- If your project is set up for it, you can

[GitHub] storm issue #2154: Storm 1290:port backtype.storm.local-state-test to java

2017-06-10 Thread kamleshbhatt
Github user kamleshbhatt commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2154 Modified as per review comments. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] storm pull request #2233: Storm 2258: Streams api - support CoGroupByKey

2017-07-20 Thread kamleshbhatt
GitHub user kamleshbhatt opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2233 Storm 2258: Streams api - support CoGroupByKey You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/kamleshbhatt/storm STORM-2258

[GitHub] storm issue #2233: Storm 2258: Streams api - support CoGroupByKey

2017-07-31 Thread kamleshbhatt
Github user kamleshbhatt commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2233 Please review. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so

[GitHub] storm issue #2233: Storm 2258: Streams api - support CoGroupByKey

2017-08-06 Thread kamleshbhatt
Github user kamleshbhatt commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2233 Thanks for reviewing the PR. Modified the changes as per review comments. Please take a look. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on

[GitHub] storm pull request #2233: Storm 2258: Streams api - support CoGroupByKey

2017-08-20 Thread kamleshbhatt
Github user kamleshbhatt commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2233#discussion_r134122065 --- Diff: storm-client/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/streams/processors/CoGroupByKeyProcessor.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ +/** + * Licensed to the

[GitHub] storm pull request #2233: Storm 2258: Streams api - support CoGroupByKey

2017-08-20 Thread kamleshbhatt
Github user kamleshbhatt commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2233#discussion_r134122087 --- Diff: storm-client/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/streams/processors/CoGroupByKeyProcessor.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ +/** + * Licensed to the

[GitHub] storm issue #2233: Storm 2258: Streams api - support CoGroupByKey

2017-08-22 Thread kamleshbhatt
Github user kamleshbhatt commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2233 Unable to squash the commits, tried multiple times. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have

[GitHub] storm pull request #2233: Storm 2258: Streams api - support CoGroupByKey

2017-08-25 Thread kamleshbhatt
Github user kamleshbhatt closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2233 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] storm issue #2233: Storm 2258: Streams api - support CoGroupByKey

2017-08-25 Thread kamleshbhatt
Github user kamleshbhatt commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2233 Thanks for all your help and guidance. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

[GitHub] storm pull request #2296: Beam runner

2017-08-29 Thread kamleshbhatt
GitHub user kamleshbhatt opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2296 Beam runner You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/apache/storm beam-runner Alternatively you can review and apply these changes

[GitHub] storm pull request #2296: Beam runner

2017-08-29 Thread kamleshbhatt
Github user kamleshbhatt closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2296 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature