[GitHub] storm issue #2723: [STORM-3112] Incremental scheduling supports

2018-10-24 Thread danny0405
Github user danny0405 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2723 @revans2 Hi, Bobby, do you have time to review this patch now, cause it's a little long time and i kind of forget details about this patch, thx in advance. ---

[GitHub] storm issue #2723: [STORM-3112] Incremental scheduling supports

2018-08-25 Thread danny0405
Github user danny0405 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2723 @revans2 @HeartSaVioR Hi, can you help to review this patch now, just a kindly reminder. ---

[GitHub] storm issue #2723: [STORM-3112] Incremental scheduling supports

2018-07-09 Thread danny0405
Github user danny0405 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2723 @HeartSaVioR I have already attach the test data in the comment, also a test class everyone can have a test. ---

[GitHub] storm issue #2723: [STORM-3112] Incremental scheduling supports

2018-07-09 Thread HeartSaVioR
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2723 I'd like to say it doesn't mean I don't plan to review this. I'd rather say other issues which are directly coupled with releases (mostly Storm 2.0.0) should be reviewed prior to this, unless you

[GitHub] storm issue #2723: [STORM-3112] Incremental scheduling supports

2018-07-09 Thread HeartSaVioR
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2723 @danny0405 Could you address @revans2 comment, mostly backing up your proposed patch with numbers? You may want to get help to correctly measure numbers from well-known library like JMH.

[GitHub] storm issue #2723: [STORM-3112] Incremental scheduling supports

2018-07-08 Thread danny0405
Github user danny0405 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2723 @revans2 @HeartSaVioR Can you help me to review this again ? thx very much ---

[GitHub] storm issue #2723: [STORM-3112] Incremental scheduling supports

2018-06-30 Thread danny0405
Github user danny0405 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2723 @revans2 Hi, bobby, i have already updated the test data for this patch. As for NeedsFullTopologiesScheduler, i agree to remove it. We can tweak the IsolationScheduler or cache topolog

[GitHub] storm issue #2723: [STORM-3112] Incremental scheduling supports

2018-06-25 Thread revans2
Github user revans2 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2723 @danny0405 I have spent some time looking at your patch, I have not found any issues with the code itself, but I easily could have missed something. My biggest problems is that I just cannot get pas

[GitHub] storm issue #2723: [STORM-3112] Incremental scheduling supports

2018-06-24 Thread HeartSaVioR
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2723 @danny0405 Remaining tasks would be mostly reviewing existing PRs. I'll sort out and add them to the epic issue for Storm 2.0.0. ---

[GitHub] storm issue #2723: [STORM-3112] Incremental scheduling supports

2018-06-24 Thread danny0405
Github user danny0405 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2723 @HeartSaVioR Really thx, BTW, i can help to fix if there some bugs left for releasing STORM-2.0.0. ---

[GitHub] storm issue #2723: [STORM-3112] Incremental scheduling supports

2018-06-24 Thread HeartSaVioR
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2723 @danny0405 I'm sorry but now I feel I need to have time to focus on current milestone - Storm 2.0.0 - and for Storm 2.0.0, this is a kind of improvement and non-blocker. There're some is

[GitHub] storm issue #2723: [STORM-3112] Incremental scheduling supports

2018-06-23 Thread HeartSaVioR
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2723 @danny0405 Unfortunately I also can't run a large cluster. I could run Storm in 3~4 VM nodes but I think the patch will not address such small cluster. I'll take a look at design difference and c

[GitHub] storm issue #2723: [STORM-3112] Incremental scheduling supports

2018-06-21 Thread danny0405
Github user danny0405 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2723 @HeartSaVioR Sorry, i have left my company and do not maintain large storm cluster now, i can only test the numbers on my laptop, i will make a diagram this weekend. ---

[GitHub] storm issue #2723: [STORM-3112] Incremental scheduling supports

2018-06-21 Thread HeartSaVioR
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2723 @danny0405 Providing some numbers would help persuading others if it is easy to measure. If it is not easy to get the numbers, I'm OK to skip and compare the difference of diagram/code. --

[GitHub] storm issue #2723: [STORM-3112] Incremental scheduling supports

2018-06-20 Thread danny0405
Github user danny0405 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2723 ![old-schedule](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/7644508/41694346-6e337912-753c-11e8-9ea1-422c0bc19c55.jpg) @revans2 I draw a img to describe what the work flow was before this pat

[GitHub] storm issue #2723: [STORM-3112] Incremental scheduling supports

2018-06-20 Thread revans2
Github user revans2 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2723 @danny0405 There is a lot of code here and I am trying to understand what exactly this is doing, because it is hard to get it from just the code. I can see the extra caching that you put in for the

[GitHub] storm issue #2723: [STORM-3112] Incremental scheduling supports

2018-06-20 Thread danny0405
Github user danny0405 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2723 @revans2 @HeartSaVioR Hi, Bobby, HeartSaVioR, please help me to review this if you have time, thx in advance. ---

[GitHub] storm issue #2723: [STORM-3112] Incremental scheduling supports

2018-06-18 Thread danny0405
Github user danny0405 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2723 @HeartSaVioR @revans2 Please help me to review this if you have time, thx in advance ---