[GitHub] storm pull request: [STORM-942] Add FluxParser method parseInputSt...

2015-07-16 Thread HeartSaVioR
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/637#issuecomment-122117993 @lyonbrw I cherry-picked your efforts into master now. Would you close this PR? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your

[GitHub] storm pull request: [STORM-942] Add FluxParser method parseInputSt...

2015-07-16 Thread HeartSaVioR
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/637#issuecomment-122099913 @lyonbrw Actually I recommended you to make new branch before do some works. I can cherry-pick your commits into master, so let me handle it for now. --- If

[GitHub] storm pull request: [STORM-942] Add FluxParser method parseInputSt...

2015-07-16 Thread lyonbrw
Github user lyonbrw commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/637#issuecomment-122099783 Indentation fixed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

[GitHub] storm pull request: [STORM-942] Add FluxParser method parseInputSt...

2015-07-16 Thread HeartSaVioR
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/637#discussion_r34835109 --- Diff: external/flux/flux-core/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/flux/parser/FluxParser.java --- @@ -44,40 +44,47 @@ private FluxParser(){} //

[GitHub] storm pull request: [STORM-942] Add FluxParser method parseInputSt...

2015-07-16 Thread HeartSaVioR
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/637#issuecomment-122090455 @lyonbrw Indentation is still broken. Please compare parseInputStream()'s indent level to other methods. Btw, could you get rid of merge commit from PR

[GitHub] storm pull request: [STORM-942] Add FluxParser method parseInputSt...

2015-07-16 Thread lyonbrw
Github user lyonbrw commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/637#issuecomment-122097348 Apologize for the merge commit. What is the proper way to remove it? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on

[GitHub] storm pull request: [STORM-942] Add FluxParser method parseInputSt...

2015-07-16 Thread HeartSaVioR
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/637#issuecomment-122100673 OK, confirmed that all things fixed. +1. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] storm pull request: [STORM-942] Add FluxParser method parseInputSt...

2015-07-16 Thread lyonbrw
Github user lyonbrw commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/637#issuecomment-122130478 Will do. Thanks. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

[GitHub] storm pull request: [STORM-942] Add FluxParser method parseInputSt...

2015-07-16 Thread lyonbrw
Github user lyonbrw closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/637 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is