[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-1055

2015-09-20 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/749 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl

[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-1055

2015-09-20 Thread HeartSaVioR
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/749#issuecomment-141851180 +1 I'll merge into master, and 0.10.x with #748 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. I

[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-1055

2015-09-20 Thread randerzander
GitHub user randerzander opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/749 STORM-1055 missed a second map->hikariConfigMap. Please also merge in 0.10.x, which has the same README issue. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ g

[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-1055

2015-09-20 Thread HeartSaVioR
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/748#issuecomment-141844867 @randerzander Please request another PR with same title. Please leave a reminder to new PR so that I can take care of merging into 0.10.x-branch at that time. -

[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-1055

2015-09-20 Thread randerzander
Github user randerzander commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/748#issuecomment-141844499 Unfortunately I missed an additional map->hikariConfigMap example further down the README. Also, this applies to the 0.10.x branch as well. Is it possible to merge t

[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-1055

2015-09-20 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/748 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl

[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-1055

2015-09-20 Thread randerzander
Github user randerzander commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/748#discussion_r39935407 --- Diff: external/storm-jdbc/README.md --- @@ -3,14 +3,16 @@ Storm/Trident integration for JDBC. This package includes the core bolts and tri to eit

[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-1055

2015-09-20 Thread HeartSaVioR
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/748#issuecomment-141840670 +1. Since it modifies only doc., I'll merge into master right now. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on

[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-1055

2015-09-20 Thread HeartSaVioR
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/748#issuecomment-141839836 You don't need to consider about Travis CI since you modifies only markdown file. It's due to random test failures. --- If your project is set up for it, you can

[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-1055

2015-09-20 Thread HeartSaVioR
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/748#discussion_r39935249 --- Diff: external/storm-jdbc/README.md --- @@ -3,14 +3,16 @@ Storm/Trident integration for JDBC. This package includes the core bolts and tri to eith

[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-1055

2015-09-20 Thread HeartSaVioR
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/748#discussion_r39935246 --- Diff: external/storm-jdbc/README.md --- @@ -3,14 +3,16 @@ Storm/Trident integration for JDBC. This package includes the core bolts and tri to eith

[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-1055

2015-09-20 Thread randerzander
Github user randerzander commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/748#issuecomment-141827482 Not sure why the CI build failed, as I only modified the storm-jdbc README.. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply ap

[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-1055

2015-09-19 Thread randerzander
GitHub user randerzander opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/748 STORM-1055 Fixed README by adding note about com.google.common.collect class usage, also fixed hikariConfigMap reference in example. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by run