[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-1213: Remove sigar binaries from source ...

2015-11-23 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/887 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl

[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-1213: Remove sigar binaries from source ...

2015-11-19 Thread revans2
Github user revans2 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/887#issuecomment-158199509 @ptgoetz +1 the changes look good and my manual tests all pass. I Agree the it kind of ugly. Ideally what we need to do is to talk to sigar and see if they

[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-1213: Remove sigar binaries from source ...

2015-11-19 Thread ptgoetz
Github user ptgoetz commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/887#issuecomment-158184985 @revans2 I couldn't get the maven dependency plugin to do what I wanted, so I changed tactics. I switched to using the maven antrun plugin to download and unpack the siga

[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-1213: Remove sigar binaries from source ...

2015-11-19 Thread revans2
Github user revans2 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/887#issuecomment-158094151 @ptgoetz Yes you are correct about the changes. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr

[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-1213: Remove sigar binaries from source ...

2015-11-18 Thread ptgoetz
Github user ptgoetz commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/887#issuecomment-157880047 @revans2 Ah... okay. So we need to change `resources/resources` to just `resources`, and remove the `-1.6.4` from the libraries, correct? That should be doable wi

[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-1213: Remove sigar binaries from source ...

2015-11-18 Thread revans2
Github user revans2 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/887#issuecomment-157876251 yes that is it. When I moved `resources/libsigar-universal64-macosx-1.6.4.dylib` to `resources/libsigar-universal64-macosx.dylib` and reran it all worked. --- If your

[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-1213: Remove sigar binaries from source ...

2015-11-18 Thread revans2
Github user revans2 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/887#issuecomment-157874959 I just did a diff of the contents of the two jars, old and new(this patch plus me moving the native libraries) and I came up with the following. Around the max native pie

[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-1213: Remove sigar binaries from source ...

2015-11-18 Thread revans2
Github user revans2 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/887#issuecomment-157873921 In master https://github.com/apache/storm/tree/master/external/storm-metrics/src/main/resources gets mapped into the base directory of the jar. So https://github.com/ap

[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-1213: Remove sigar binaries from source ...

2015-11-18 Thread ptgoetz
Github user ptgoetz commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/887#issuecomment-157869384 @revans2 That directory structure is what's in master right now: https://github.com/apache/storm/tree/master/external/storm-metrics/src/main/resources/resources

[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-1213: Remove sigar binaries from source ...

2015-11-18 Thread ptgoetz
Github user ptgoetz commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/887#issuecomment-157868784 @revans2 How are you running it (i.e. local/remote/unit test)? My first thought is that we may just need to bind the dependency plugin to a different maven lifecycle. -

[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-1213: Remove sigar binaries from source ...

2015-11-18 Thread revans2
Github user revans2 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/887#issuecomment-157862181 Even with changing the directory I am getting ``` java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: org.hyperic.sigar.Sigar.getPid()J at org.hyperic.sigar.Sigar.getPid(Nativ

[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-1213: Remove sigar binaries from source ...

2015-11-18 Thread revans2
Github user revans2 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/887#issuecomment-157858618 Sorry about the comments after giving it a +1. I manually ran LatencyVsThroughput and saw that it was not working. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply t

[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-1213: Remove sigar binaries from source ...

2015-11-18 Thread revans2
Github user revans2 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/887#discussion_r45257318 --- Diff: external/storm-metrics/pom.xml --- @@ -55,4 +62,28 @@ provided + + + +org.apache.mave

[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-1213: Remove sigar binaries from source ...

2015-11-18 Thread revans2
Github user revans2 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/887#discussion_r45257261 --- Diff: external/storm-metrics/pom.xml --- @@ -48,6 +48,13 @@ + org.fusesource + sigar + 1.6.4

[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-1213: Remove sigar binaries from source ...

2015-11-18 Thread revans2
Github user revans2 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/887#issuecomment-157857431 Actually I just tried to run this and it looks like the libraries are under `resources/resources/` instead of just `resources/` because of this I am getting linking erro

[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-1213: Remove sigar binaries from source ...

2015-11-18 Thread revans2
Github user revans2 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/887#issuecomment-157843581 +1 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and

[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-1213: Remove sigar binaries from source ...

2015-11-18 Thread jerrypeng
Github user jerrypeng commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/887#issuecomment-157827199 +1 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled an

[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-1213: Remove sigar binaries from source ...

2015-11-18 Thread kishorvpatil
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/887#issuecomment-157705671 +1 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled

[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-1213: Remove sigar binaries from source ...

2015-11-17 Thread ptgoetz
GitHub user ptgoetz opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/887 STORM-1213: Remove sigar binaries from source tree See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1213 for description. Also removes the LICENSE entry for sigar, since I believe that is unn