Tuesday, April 11, 2017 1:48 AM
> To: d...@beam.apache.org; dev@storm.apache.org
> Subject: Apache Storm/JStorm Runner(s) for Apache Beam
>
> Note: cross-posting to dev@beam and dev@storm
>
> I’ve seen at least two threads on the dev@ list discussing the JStorm
> runner and my hope
Beam, Storm and JStorm.
Regards
Jian Liu(Basti)
-Original Message-
From: P. Taylor Goetz [mailto:ptgo...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 1:48 AM
To: d...@beam.apache.org; dev@storm.apache.org
Subject: Apache Storm/JStorm Runner(s) for Apache Beam
Note: cross-posting to dev@bea
Hi Taylor,
Thanks immensely for taking the time to write such rich detail. I have a
lot to learn about the relationship between Storm and JStorm as software
and as communities.
Your final note I can immediately agree with and reinforce. The fruits of
this endeavor should reside in the Beam reposi
Hi Taylor,
I am very glad to see the interests in pushing forward Beam Storm runner.
However, I cannot convince myself the benefits of having one runner to
support all.
Beam have three types of users: pipeline writers, library writers, and
runner implementers.
I can see pros vs cons as following
Note: cross-posting to dev@beam and dev@storm
I’ve seen at least two threads on the dev@ list discussing the JStorm runner
and my hope is we can expand on that discussion and cross-pollinate with the
Storm/JStorm/Beam communities as well.
A while back I created a very preliminary proof of conce
