Blog Post for Storm 0.10.0 Release

2015-06-08 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
I’m working on a blog post for the 0.10.0 release and plan on highlighting the main new features. There are a lot and I want to make sure I mention them. Below is what I have off the top of my head (in no particular order aside from the fist): * Security (the big one) * Support for future r

Re: Blog Post for Storm 0.10.0 Release

2015-06-08 Thread Bobby Evans
What do you mean by not backwards compatible?  From the API perspective it should be binary compatible, and should be able to run old topologies without a recompile (assuming no dependencies from storm were used, and I believe at least one config was removed, but you would have to check). When r

Re: Blog Post for Storm 0.10.0 Release

2015-06-08 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
I'm thinking also about external components. I'm not in front of source right now, but I think we changed the kafka config in a non backward compatible way. We're probably okay with a statement about recompiling. And, yes, older components such as storm-kafka should continue to work without repa

Re: Blog Post for Storm 0.10.0 Release

2015-06-08 Thread Bobby Evans
Ya the reason I have been thinking about it is because we have been trough it with our customers for security already, and we have are preparing for upmerging to 0.10.0 and we need to tell our customers what to do.  - Bobby On Monday, June 8, 2015 5:15 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: I

Re: Blog Post for Storm 0.10.0 Release

2015-06-12 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
Here’s the latest working draft of the blog post, which I hope to post on Monday following the release. (note that I haven’t finished the shaded dependency table) Any feedback is welcome. -Taylor --- layout: post title: Storm 0.10.0-beta Released author: P. Taylor Goetz --- Fast on the heals

Re: Blog Post for Storm 0.10.0 Release

2015-06-15 Thread Bobby Evans
It looks good to me.  There are a few spelling mistakes, that TextMate pointed out to me, but beyond that it looks fine.  - Bobby On Friday, June 12, 2015 4:26 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: Here’s the latest working draft of the blog post, which I hope to post on Monday following th