As for the $subject, we are identified following modifications.
1. We will maintain the map of executor services which returns the executor
service per component. Once the component (eg CC,AS) needs to create a
thread it should be getting his relevant executor service from
the executor service ma
Hi all,
Currently we do $subject. IMO we should have include this in Cloud
Controller. Because that is the place we are keeping IaaS related
information and the control of the IaaS objects.
Wdyt?
Thanks.
--
--
Lahiru Sandaruwan
Committer and PMC member, Apache Stratos,
Senior Software Engineer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-1009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14229409#comment-14229409
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STRATOS-1009:
-
Github user swgkg closed the pull req
Github user swgkg commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/stratos/pull/125#issuecomment-65020107
Changes merge with #127 , hence closing the PR
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proj
Github user swgkg closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/stratos/pull/121
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user swgkg commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/stratos/pull/121#issuecomment-65020126
Changes merge with #127 , hence closing the PR
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proj
Github user swgkg closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/stratos/pull/125
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Hi Devs,
I have now completed the initial implementation of $subject and pushed
those changes to master branch.
Thanks
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Gayan Gunarathne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Akila Ravihansa Perera <
> raviha...@wso2.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Accord
Hi Reka,
We also need an extra parameter for group deployment policies which defines if
“children” (or group member) should be collocated (or not), please see in the
grouping specification “these Children must be physically next to each other”,
not sure how this will expressed in the applicati
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 11:41 PM, Reka Thirunavukkarasu
wrote:
> Hi Lahiru,
>
> [Re-sending as content seems missing]
>
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Lahiru Sandaruwan
> wrote:
>
>> Looks good Reka,
>>
>> We might need to get the minimum count of instances of a particular
>> cluster.
>>
>>
Hi Lahiru,
[Re-sending as content seems missing]
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Lahiru Sandaruwan
wrote:
> Looks good Reka,
>
> We might need to get the minimum count of instances of a particular
> cluster.
>
> We can get it per cluster which will be effective for all the network
> partition
Hi Lahiru,
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Lahiru Sandaruwan
wrote:
> Looks good Reka,
>
> We might need to get the minimum count of instances of a particular
> cluster.
>
> We can get it per cluster which will be effective for all the network
> partitions or per network partition.
>
> If it
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Isuru Haththotuwa
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Lahiru Sandaruwan
> wrote:
>
>> Looks good Reka,
>>
>> We might need to get the minimum count of instances of a particular
>> cluster.
>>
> +1, this should be min per cluster instance AFAIU.
>
Cor
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Lahiru Sandaruwan
wrote:
> Looks good Reka,
>
> We might need to get the minimum count of instances of a particular
> cluster.
>
+1, this should be min per cluster instance AFAIU.
>
> We can get it per cluster which will be effective for all the network
> partit
Looks good Reka,
We might need to get the minimum count of instances of a particular cluster.
We can get it per cluster which will be effective for all the network
partitions or per network partition.
If it is per cluster,
+ id
+ applicationPolicy[1..1]
+ appId
+ networkPartitio
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Lahiru Sandaruwan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It seems now we can handle LB cartridge as a part of group definition, and
> not as a special cartridge. Therefore we can do $subject.
>
+1.
>
> Wdyt?
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> --
> Lahiru Sandaruwan
> Committer and PMC member, A
Master is back to buildable state now!
Thanks.
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Nirmal Fernando
wrote:
> Sorry, there was a typo in $subject!
>
> Master branch will not be compilable for some time
>
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Lahiru Sandaruwan
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 30, 2014
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-1002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14229068#comment-14229068
]
Rajkumar Rajaratnam commented on STRATOS-1002:
--
Committed jclouds gce apis
Sorry, there was a typo in $subject!
Master branch will not be compilable for some time
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Lahiru Sandaruwan
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Nirmal Fernando
> wrote:
>
>> I've committed the changes now. Lahiru please continue.
>>
> on it!
>
>>
>> O
19 matches
Mail list logo
