Re: DISCUSS: support of fixed MAC address

+1 Yes, may be we could track these improvements via JIRA and plan for a series of minor releases. On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Lakmal Warusawithana wrote: > +1, Shall we add this in next immediate release? since we have feature > freeze for 4.1.0 and about to do a RC > > On Thu, Apr 16, 20

Re: LoadBalancer on Amazon EC2 gets stuck waiting for ports to be active.

Hi Ricardo, Sorry for the delay..It seems that your loadbalancer server is not properly coming up. Can you /repository/logs/wso2carbon.log(LB usually is in /mnt//) to see what has happened to load balancer server? Also, you will need to make sure that whether loadbalancer server has been started b

Re: [Q] Why is the samples hierarchy so long in 4.1.0-kubernetes-v6/

Hi Imesh, I got the steps for [1] based on the steps that you had mentioned in [3], which included the link to [2]. Should I instruct the user to clone the Stratos distribution and build it instead of downloading from [2]? [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/STRATOS/4.1.0-Beta+Testi

Re: DISCUSS: support of fixed MAC address

+1, Shall we add this in next immediate release? since we have feature freeze for 4.1.0 and about to do a RC On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 3:23 AM, Martin Eppel (meppel) wrote: > Hi, > > > > We are having a use case which requires to spin up a VM with a predefined > fixed MAC address (similar to fixe

Re: [Q?] Updating the Kubernetes-CoreOS Host via REST API?

Are we using HTTP PATCH method for partially update the resource Kubernetes host? As for the email thread[1] it is listed there , but I think we didn't implement that. [1] Use of create instead of deploy within Stratos Thanks, Gayan On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 12:38 AM, Chamila De Alwis wrote: > I

[jira] [Created] (STRATOS-1335) wrong cartridge removed - undeploy.sh - group-cartridges

Shavindri Dissanayake created STRATOS-1335: -- Summary: wrong cartridge removed - undeploy.sh - group-cartridges Key: STRATOS-1335 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-1335 Project

Re: Group Level Deployment Policy and Cartridge Level Deployment Policy

Thanks Vanson for the detailed note. It narrowed down the problem. +1 for using group level deployment policy to provide the min/max of group instances only. Cartridge instances min/max can be specified by the respective cartridge in cartridge deployment policy according whether it is R1/R2/R3. H

[jira] [Created] (STRATOS-1334) wrong cartridge group removed - undeploy.sh - group-cartridges

Shavindri Dissanayake created STRATOS-1334: -- Summary: wrong cartridge group removed - undeploy.sh - group-cartridges Key: STRATOS-1334 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-1334