Hi Ashan,
Thanks for the update, Hope to catch you on hangout (Monday 10EST). We need
to check UI + code.
meantime please follow this as wel. [1]
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/STRATOS/Coding+Standards+and+Best+Practices
Regards,
*Dakshika Jayathilaka*
PMC Member & Committer
Hi All,
Please find my commits to the Health Statistics Ui using the fallowing
branch[1].This will be using in the future to commit the code. The Rest API
that implemented upto now can be find from here [2].I will update on any
further changes.
[1]=https://github.com/ashandk/stratos/tree/HealthSt
Hi All,
As i talked with Imesh started a workaround to use RDBMS to publish data
from CEP and retrieve data through the REST API to the UI. I will proceed
that way and keep in touch with CEP. If we can get a patch from CEP for the
blocker i faced then we can go with cassandra.
Thank You!
Best Reg
Hi Gayan,
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Gayan Gunarathne wrote:
>
>
> We are not creating the new listener objects in LoadBalancerExtension
> class for every event. Issue here is we are updating and reading the
> TopologyProvider with two different listeners for member activate event. So
> we
I have now fixed above issue with the following commit revision:
https://github.com/apache/stratos/commit/6ebf5ead2bdc66272e01ee557c5122c2765bf771
I tested both nginx and haproxy extensions with Kubernetes, we can now go
ahead with the release build.
Thanks
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Imesh
On Friday, July 3, 2015, David Hbase wrote:
> +1 It's critical to realize the Dynamic load balancing with auto-scaling.
> We need to auto spawn the new instance, but most important for the
> production is: Dynamically balancing the new member ( Instance / Container
> / Minions ).
>
> Issue:
> . I
+1 It's critical to realize the Dynamic load balancing with auto-scaling.
We need to auto spawn the new instance, but most important for the
production is: Dynamically balancing the new member ( Instance / Container
/ Minions ).
Issue:
. If remove the SLB, Can we confirm the upstream SSL functions
+1 for this. Since there are widely used LBs out there IMO we should focus
on creating / testing more 3rd party LB integrations and make those
available as docker images or cartridges
Thanks,
Sajith
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Gayan Gunarathne wrote:
> +1 for this.
>
> As there are lot of
>
>
> We are not creating the new listener objects in LoadBalancerExtension
> class for every event.
Yes I understand. Thanks Imesh and Gayan for looking into this.
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Gayan Gunarathne wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Imesh Gunaratne wrote:
>
>>
